Sbatio

Sbatio t1_j8ijcce wrote

That’s so frustrating, I feel like quality of products and quality of service have gone down all over the area.

How are the donuts tho?

What’s the best place for donuts in the area?

3

Sbatio t1_j82np5y wrote

Reply to Tailor Shop? by revsfan94

London Tailor is pretty good. I take my stuff there. Occasionally I have to have him redo something but they take good care of me.

Best I’ve found in the city so far, interested to see what others say.

5

Sbatio t1_j7l8rm7 wrote

Welcome to the neighborhood!

Your post makes me think of how many projects I need help on.

What does everyone thing of posting “quick jobs” on this sub in general?

8

Sbatio t1_j1xmsja wrote

Reply to Road Salt by Dr_ThunderMD

I’m all for using a eco friendly alternative. I don’t know much about it.

1

Sbatio t1_j1f06ds wrote

No. Not with checkpoints that screen all people regardless of any evidence of a crime.

I get that it is legal for the cops to do it but it is in direct conflict with people being secure in their person and effects.

The police should only be allowed to stop you or anyone if they witness you doing something illegal or that would reasonably cause a person to suspect you of a crime.

In the case of DUI, the driver can’t maintain speed or position inside their lane, or they repeatedly break hard, or improper use of lights and signals, failure to fully stop 🛑, etc.

So many things are sufficient to trigger a stop, it is unreasonable to check everyone proactively.

5

Sbatio t1_j1eyxf7 wrote

They do them in rural areas to catch undocumented workers. I’ve driven through a few with my friend there who is a lawyer.

Basically he explained in PA as long as the police post that the check point is ahead and people can turn off to avoid it then its legal.

Ive also heard that if you are within 100 miles of an international border(which includes international airports so it covers most of the country) our rights are limited too.

Then in another thread it was pointed out that checkpoints were challenged in the Supreme Court and upheld as lawful activity for the police.

So I think we are pretty stuck with them from a legal perspective. But there can still be pressure on elected officials to limit them I guess

2

Sbatio OP t1_j1c2c9o wrote

Art is the handmaid of human good.

It would be beautiful, it would reflect off the Merrimack, the lighting could be an event like Christmas Tree lightings are many places.

People love things like this, there are the Ice palace lights, the zoo lights, there is the 200 xmas tree display in Medford annually, the Boston common tree lighting, Rockefeller center, etc

Why not spend it on schools? Because our schools are well funded, not every dollar should be spent on utility.

This is funding the arts.

0

Sbatio OP t1_j1buode wrote

That is no small amount of money for an individual but more manageable as part of the city budget.

Some could be lit by projecting light onto them, which would be cheaper. Like one could have the city seal hitting it towards the top and that’s the whole display for 1.

Do you have any research from back when you did the interview about who else owns the other stacks?

0