Because, hopefully, you care about truth. A claim with no evidence is baseless. Why do you subscribe to Indigenophilia?

You have no evidence that this policy on native women was ever conceived, let alone implemented.

Also, why do you subscribe to the noble-savage myth? There is plenty of evidence against it.

You think the Europeans tried to encourage the natives to attack other tribes for women?

They didn’t do so on account of their not having the ability, not out of moral superiority. They still fought over property, such as a women.

Why do you think they started treating women as property and killing each other only when Europeans came?

You think the tribes didn’t fight each other before the Europeans arrived?

Aboriginal intertribal warfare did occur, and it even involved transfers of property in the form of women.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_frontier_wars#:~:text=In%201840%2C%20the%20American-Canadian%20ethnologist%20Horatio%20Hale%20identified,ritual%20trials%2C%20raids%20for%20women%2C%20and%20revenge%20attacks.

See the section on traditional aboriginal warfare

Conquest wasn’t just done for greed. It was also a means of security, at least in antiquity.

Why do you think conquest is evil?

What steps do you think should be taken, in an ideal world?

It’s remarkable that such a thing even exists, a government willingly surrendering land as a matter of values. Almost all land on this planet has been conquered from others. I suppose the granting of a title still implicitly recognizes that the government of Australia possesses jurisdiction over the land.

What do you mean by reconcile?