>Get educated https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_circuit

Where does that say anything about biological neural networks being probabilistic?

Also contradicting your claims:

>The connections between neurons in the brain are much more complex than those of the artificial neurons used in the connectionist neural computing models of artificial neural networks.

​

>Of course we can. 1 and 0 are both part of the probability cloud.

And how would being in probability solve mathematical problems?

Biologists haven't said anything about how human neural networks work.

That's like saying all mathematical problems can somehow be solved with statistics and probabilities. And that's just sheer nonsense.

How do you know how human neural networks work? And why would a branch of mathematics somehow branch into other areas of intelligence?

>Which task specifically do you think LLM cant do?

Anything that requires more than statistics and probabilities. Are you claiming that all intelligence is somehow rooted in statistics and probabilities?

>And you think this is the end of the line? With in-context learning already working?

Doesn't matter, they're just statistics and probabilities. It won't somehow evolve into general intelligence.

>Just like anything else.

Except for human intelligence, which is clearly not static.

>Exactly. So clearly you can make an AGI without knowing how it works also.

If you want to program it, then no.

It's static because it's just statistics and probabilities.

>This is obviously not true, since your mother made you, and she knows nothing about AGI.

I don't see what your point is. My mother doesn't know anything about how human intelligence works.

It could be issues with RAM, contact Apple.

Mainstream Japanese music is ridiculously sanitized. It’s probably used as a means of social control.

Watching too much anime and hentai will do that to you.

That’s kinda weird. Even if you went in with a young boy you can still use the seated toilet. If you can do the piss on a standing toilet then you should just go to the mens bathroom.

No one claims that AirPods are the best, they just work well with Apple devices.

You don't usually need to close apps, but sometimes there's a glitch where it keeps running in the background.

iOS permits apps to be run in the background for up to 10 minutes. No app can run in the background for more than 10 minutes (unless for something like playing music).

I like Torras

The HIV bypasses the human immune system by hiding inside and attacking the T-helper cells. The T-helper cells are responsible for activating the other cells such as the Natural Killer cells to fight and attack against an infection.

It seems like the CCR5 delta 32 mutation disables the CCR5 receptor on the surface of white blood cells/T-helper cells. The HIV uses this CCR5 receptor to latch onto the T-helper cells and get into it.

People with these genes are immune to HIV because the HIV can't latch onto the white blood cells/T-helper cells.

The current traditional vaccines don't work against HIV because vaccines are about making the T-helper cells activate the other cells to fight against the infection. The HIV goes straight to the T-helper cells. Without the T-helper cells, the immune system is compromised and the body is completely helpless against infections.

Things like the bone marrow transplants work because the bone marrow creates the blood cells like the T-helper cells (without the CCR5 receptor).

It's likely due to higher brightness of the screen of newer phones.

You need to stop being so sensitive about Apple products. calm down.

Can you actually read? I said "Science is about coming up with theories and explanations." after that sentence. Obviously I included the "problem" part in its meaning.

Obviously I said "science is about gathering data and doing measurements". Science is about coming up with theories and explanations. Otherwise you might just have a bunch of garbage data and measurements that don't help with anything.

Because just collecting data doesn't allow us to find causal connections, or "explanations" for that data. The data just might be a bunch of garbage data.

We need explanations or theories to know what data is relevant in the first place.

theory
noun.

a formal statement of the rules on which a subject of study is based or of ideas that are suggested to explain a fact or event or, more generally, an opinion or explanation:

economic theory

scientific theory

Darwin's theory of evolution

noun.

something suggested as a reasonable explanation for facts, a condition, or an event, esp. a systematic or scientific explanation:

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/theory

Darwin's theory of evolution doesn't have any data or basis in data. It's an explanation of data.

Yes, it is tested by data, but in no way that a theory contains any data. Nor is it based on any data.

>You have a dangerous, fundamental misunderstanding of science.

Speak for yourself. You are making contradictions because if a theory contained any data, then it ceases to be a theory.

And what does that exactly have to do with “data”? If you go all the way down then science started with myths and legends. We thought maybe the earth was flat, maybe the earth was round, etc.

There is not a single scientific theory that contains “data”, because if it did, then by definition it stops being a theory and it just becomes data.

Of course, we test a theory by data, but the theory itself is not data.

And how did you exactly come up with that hypothesis? It certainly wasn’t just gathering “data”.

Einstein barely gathered data and instead did a lot of thought experiments to come up with relativity.

Well again the problem is thinking that science is about gathering data and doing measurements. That doesn't really help with figuring out how things work.