Simcurious
Simcurious t1_jdzhbyu wrote
Reply to comment by sb1729 in [N] OpenAI may have benchmarked GPT-4’s coding ability on it’s own training data by Balance-
The title implies that they evaluated on data from before 2021 while the source says they didn't.
Simcurious t1_jdzatox wrote
Reply to [N] OpenAI may have benchmarked GPT-4’s coding ability on it’s own training data by Balance-
That's not correct, the benchmark they used only contained codeforce problems from after 2021.
From Horace's tweets: >Considering the codeforces results in the paper (very poor!), they might have only evaluated it on recent problems.
Simcurious t1_j9umv53 wrote
Reply to comment by fmai in [D] To the ML researchers and practitioners here, do you worry about AI safety/alignment of the type Eliezer Yudkowsky describes? by SchmidhuberDidIt
That's Pascal's wager and could be used to justify belief in hell/god.
Simcurious t1_ix9848n wrote
Reply to Would like to say that this subreddit's attitude towards progress is admirable and makes this sub better than most other future related discussion hubs by Foundation12a
It reminds me of the futurology subreddit before it became a default, filled with well meaning people that understood a better future was possible. When it became a default despite the wishes of the users it became the pessimistic hellhole it is today. I'm still angry about it.
Simcurious t1_jebn8iw wrote
Reply to There's wild manipulation of news regarding the "AI research pause" letter. by QuartzPuffyStar
It is a ploy for Musk to catch up though. He hates openAi for not making him ceo: https://www.semafor.com/article/03/24/2023/the-secret-history-of-elon-musk-sam-altman-and-openai
He withdrew funding and is launching a competitor, these 6 months are perfect for him to catch up.
Also most of the funding for that institute that created this letter comes from... You guessed it... Elon Musk