SkipX
SkipX t1_j6npg5t wrote
Reply to comment by muzukashidesuyo in The Conscious AI Conundrum: Exploring the Possibility of Artificial Self-Awareness by AUFunmacy
It's an interesting misunderstanding isn't it, but natural in a way. For oneself to know or rather experience that there is consciousness and then to make the connection that similar creatures as oneself must have that same property feels just right, even logical. But the fact that there is no scientifically quality to quantify that observation makes consciousness quite naturally a rather mythical property.
SkipX t1_j6nodub wrote
Reply to comment by KishCom in The Conscious AI Conundrum: Exploring the Possibility of Artificial Self-Awareness by AUFunmacy
I think your answer fundamentaly misunderstands consciousness. Though thats an understandable mistake to make.
I do not believe that there is any real evidence of what consciousness actually is and whether anything even has it (outside of yourself but that is different problem). To then claim you know what can NOT have consciousness is pretty naïve.
SkipX t1_j6nzc9c wrote
Reply to comment by TheRealBeaker420 in The Conscious AI Conundrum: Exploring the Possibility of Artificial Self-Awareness by AUFunmacy
Well then what evidence is there which can not be adequately explained without consciousness?
Also just to make it clearer, I do not claim it to BE mythical. Just that it is easy to seem mythical.