>For example, one such assumption is, given that Russian space forces have relied primarily on reversible or “soft kill” counter-space systems, and not on “hard kill” weapons systems like anti-satellite (ASAT) missiles, the future of space warfighting will be based on such “soft kill” options. This is a dangerous assumption to make. It is especially unwise to base the national security space strategies and posture of the United States on such a view.

Yeah wtf I 100% agree with the author. It seems unrealistic to hope that adversaries wouldn't try to knock out the entire satellite system. That's a massive capability gap for the US.

These are really really good questions.

>So say for example I somehow can live for 10000 years near the black hole,, so then is it safe to say that 1,000,000,000 years have passed on earth?

Yes!

>Lets change the calculation accordingly, to last 100 trillion years on earth, scientists say the big freeze or the death of the universe will occur in 100 trillion years, so If I could somehow find a black hole that can decelerate my time even higher, technically, I could be there 24 hrs and the universe could end?

That's a harder question. I want to say yes. When they say the universe will die they mean that all the energy and matter will break up and be one warm ball of stuff, not structured like we have now. No planets, no stars, just like dirt and heat.

>So then wth is time, isn't the black hole just 24 hrs younger then? While the earth is much more. How do we even define time now? It's all relative to earth time then? Just like countries have individual time, we have time for each black holes then. I guess it's just fascinating to think of it. Do give me your insights and opinions.

That's an excellent question. Time is relative! Time means different things depending on where you are in the universe. When scientists say things like "the earth will end in 100T years" they're giving that number to you in earth years. Time is not all relative to earth but the time you and I care most about, the age of our family and friends, the age of the world, etc. Are relative to earth.

>To think of it, could it be that some organisms perceive time much faster which can survive even on the black hole, lived for one minute and the universe ended? So we could technically find a planet with the least density to slow down time to live longer.

Sure. There could be creatures that live on a massively heavy planet. Their time would advance more slowly than our time and our time would advance more quickly to their time. Time is not an absolute thing it is entirely dependent on context.