Snoo6435

Snoo6435 t1_j9vz8pr wrote

A lot of Gen Zers on the thread not native to San Diego or California. Entitled doesn't mean you can destroy our city, so you can afford to live here. We value San Diego's heritage and aim to preserve historic neighborhoods. You should consider moving to a state that you can afford to live in rather than trying to destroy ours. It's more affordable, in Mississippi, Tennessee and other hillbillies states where ya'll will feel more at home.

−1

Snoo6435 t1_j9v66l2 wrote

Currious... how old are you? Im guessing gen Z. since you appear entitled. Are you a CA native? Are you a homeowner so that you are invested in our community? Destroying history so that people moving here from outside the community can afford to rent is rediculous. If you can't afford to buy or rent, then move away.

−1

Snoo6435 t1_j9v4dda wrote

Are you saying that the city didn't change rules to allow 8 story apartment buildings up to one mile from transit hubs into historic neighborhoods? And that no onsite parking is required? And that the neighborhood planning groups aren't included in the process? I seriously like to know. BTW, my home is in Mission Hills. My degree is in landscape architecture and planning from Cal Poly.

What is a referendum California?

In California, a ballot proposition is a referendum or an initiative measure that is submitted to the electorate for a direct decision or direct vote (or plebiscite).

0

Snoo6435 t1_j9rq1aq wrote

We won't allow developers to destroy century old historic neighborhoods by building rental units. Go somewhere else if you can't afford to live here or go out to the suburbs so you aren't living beyond your means. That way you can still make payments on your BMW's and Audis...when you should drive a beater in order to save for a down payment on a home.

−32