Crazy, because that’s what we’re doing right now as we speak.

Height of hubris we think this stuff debatable

Ultimately you can work around any detector by just having an AI learn solely of the cheater’s work. They’ll pick up on your mannerisms, which steps you skip, which route you’re more likely to take (convert to other units or just take it on as is), and what not.

In the end, there will be no way to detect AI’s work from humans. You could literally make the AI be wrong, just enough times not to trip the system but still get an A.

All this does is illustrate how stupid homework is and how important in class learning and work is.

Traditional education will always fail in a world with AI because traditional education barely works today. To put it more accurately, it barely works at the expense of the students who push themselves to work in an idiotic system.

Honestly? MIT, because MIT point-man for a lot of this shit, and they publish a lot in their school newspaper I think. Granted, some of it overlaps and will be in The Crimson (Harvard) because MIT and Harvard have this partnership.

Other than that, I usually just randomly search and read scientific publications about it and such.

Scientific American? I don’t really know. I’m so used to nobody really keeping an eye on this stuff (or any cutting edge stuff in a way that doesnt include useless noise) I just figured out how to look for it on my own a long time ago. Because some people have good stuff, but then they’ll also just post bullshit things, and then others its just all opinions.

Like the science is moving way faster than anybody realizes and so the news for whatever reason makes it sound way slower, less progressive than it is (which is odd given their affinity for misrepresenting random studies).

Tldr: you gotta find it yourself. Nobody has a one stop shop yet.

There is no limits to genetic engineering, merely the limits of the creativity of the humans who practice it.

That said, given the current free market structure of the world and given the current state of the “free market” I would say nothing short of tens of thousands of dollars, maybe hundreds? At least within next twenty years. After that too hard to say. Future unstable.

There’s also the issue of insurance coverage, which no company in the US will cover it. Not a single one. As we speak every genetic engineering procedure being done on people is done through government research programs.

Tldr: within twenty years, and for more money than anyone can afford.

Sincerely, a genetic engineering major

“Increase worker productivity” = hire less people for same result.

Come on man, even fucking miners could tell you this shit. What used to take hundreds, now takes dozens.

5G doesn’t even work, bc corpos can’t actually build anything right. I’m sure this will be just as shitty

Lol. I do have joy, but humans are dumb af and a species that is incapable of preserving its homeworld does not deserve to explore the stars. In fact, they present a danger to more responsible intelligent life elsewhere in space.

No it’s not the famine that will convince humans, itll be the tens of millions of humans dying while even more flee to the developed nations.

And there’s no guarantee that’s humans will do the right thing even then. I mean look at now, migrants flee to US and EU because of global warming or violence we have reason to believe is exacerbated by global warming.

You can’t fake it, humans need a reality check, even then no promises. They got one on the dangers of fascism and nationalism with the holocaust but in less than a hundred years the lessons are either forgotten or many were never even taught to begin with because the victors had traits of their own that implicated them.

I hope humans do the right thing. But i told myself years ago i would focus on my own plans and not interfere with human beings. There’s like a saying or some idiom that essentially goes: “the actions of the exceptional will cost the lessons of the many.” Basically, if a relative few are the reason a species disaster was avoided and not the collective action of the species, than the species hasn’t actually learned what brought them to failure and, most importantly, they didn’t learn on their own how to fix that failure.

It has the same effect as artificial evolution. In essence your species is no longer alive because it’s fit, but because outliers helped you avoid disasters. And outliers ruin the data

Nah, humans are shortsighted creatures of the present at the moment. There is little that can be done that has not already been done that would succeed in convincing humanity to change.

Wait for the natural disasters to get worse and the droughts to start killing millions via famine.

Im of the opinion that if humanity should destroy the environment to the point where humanity cant survive, that any attempts to preserve humans should be destroyed.

Failed intelligent species do not deserve to be preserved.

New form of water? No! 😤

New form of slushy? Hell yeah, Brother

Well, to be fair most of the bible is plagiarism. I wouldn’t be surprised that an AI detector would notice a book containing stuff that is more or less copied from other stuff.

That said, yeah, all of this shit is experimental. That’s the nature of it

Yeah NL has really mastered civil engineering, especially when it comes to working with water. They represent the pinnacle of it imo

No. Just no. Homeownership rate has stagnated since the conservative/capitalist cultural revolution in the 70s. Went up over 20 points in twenty years during more a progressive america (the same one that desegregated, implemented minimum wage, established social security and other welfare programs) starting under FDR and ended when Nixon took office and then since has basically remained the same for the last fifty years.

Without Americans going back to how thr US used to be, more public funding, public projects, public employment, and higher taxes on the rich things will stay as they have for the last fifty years.

If anything, homeownership rate will probably drop in the coming years as deregulation and a weakened bureaucracy has lead to hedge funds and bug businesses building rentals and buying houses en masse to turn into rentals. Watch, wait for the boomers to die out and for the Xers to hit retirement age and then you’ll see that shit get so bad.

That’s not even talking about your other “ideas”

Yes, and unlike previous revolutions this one will not create more jobs in other areas. This revolution will lead to an immense net loss of employment.

Anybody saying otherwise hasn’t looked deeper than simple anecdotes offered by those who will be shielded from this revolution.