Seriously, though, I will have to find out what their loopholes are here, because no one with the kind of money to own a PL club has not had an entity of theirs commit at least one human rights abuse.
They either wrote the rule to somehow make it impossible to connect owners to their nation, or I’m missing something.
You could make a good case that every US President in the last 30yrs has committed war crimes, then tie any political donations by owners to those committing the crimes.
I’m curious to see how deep they are willing to go.
TheMCM80 t1_jeaus7e wrote
Reply to Breaking: Premier League clubs agree new rules that can see owners/directors disqualified for “human rights abuses, based on Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020” by dragon8811
One upside… Fan ownership for every club I guess!
Seriously, though, I will have to find out what their loopholes are here, because no one with the kind of money to own a PL club has not had an entity of theirs commit at least one human rights abuse.
They either wrote the rule to somehow make it impossible to connect owners to their nation, or I’m missing something.
You could make a good case that every US President in the last 30yrs has committed war crimes, then tie any political donations by owners to those committing the crimes.
I’m curious to see how deep they are willing to go.