TheTanelornian
TheTanelornian t1_ja3w3rh wrote
Reply to comment by phdoofus in Google adverts direct pregnant women to services run by UK anti-abortion groups by Lakerlion
If by “it”, you are asking if I am claiming Google is anti-abortion… No. I’m complaining about the humanity of their business model. Sorry if that wasn’t clear.
TheTanelornian t1_ja3viu0 wrote
Reply to comment by phdoofus in Google adverts direct pregnant women to services run by UK anti-abortion groups by Lakerlion
Yellow Pages is different from Google because there is no targeting of the advert. If there was a Yellow Pages tablet, that showed you ads for/against abortion (choose whichever you disagree with) repeatedly around every trade you looked up (plumber, chiropodist, lawyer, etc), then yes, it would be similar and I’d have a similar problem with it.
It is Google’s praxis of directing ads to targeted groups, coupled with the vulnerability of some of these target groups and the willingness of otherwise-aligned parties (the anti-abortion group, here) to pay Google to do this - all three combined are the problem here. I don’t think Google gets a free pass.
I know they dropped the “Don’t be evil” mantra, presumably the ability to do things like this is why…
TheTanelornian t1_ja1inf8 wrote
Reply to comment by gramathy in Google adverts direct pregnant women to services run by UK anti-abortion groups by Lakerlion
I think you are drawing a distinction without a difference to my point immediately above. I believe Google has some responsibility for the end-result of providing the service to attack these women. shrug others apparently don't.
Still, any criticism of the God of the holy internets is always risky on reddit, hence the downvotes...
TheTanelornian t1_ja0kvtu wrote
Reply to comment by nicuramar in Google adverts direct pregnant women to services run by UK anti-abortion groups by Lakerlion
But there is intent, no ? Someone has paid Google to target these women, and Google is doing just that. I’m not saying that Google are anti-abortion per se, I’m saying they just don’t care, that this is their business model and they are executing on it.
TheTanelornian t1_ja09myi wrote
Reply to comment by Drunk_redditor650 in Google adverts direct pregnant women to services run by UK anti-abortion groups by Lakerlion
I mean yes, someone is paying Google to direct pregnant women to anti-abortion groups, but the claim still seems to stand.
TheTanelornian t1_j0x5sjw wrote
Reply to comment by Malf1532 in Apple fined 1 million euros by Paris court over App Store practices by glawgii
Apple profit (not revenue) last quarter was $20.7B
So for ~90 days they made 230 million dollars per day
So for each hour they made 9.5 million dollars per hour
So 1M euros (=1.06M$) took them 0.11 hours
... or about 7 minutes, if you round up.
At some point Apple's going to have to start buying more couches to stuff money down the back of to pay these piddling little fines, or "the cost of doing business" as it's known...
TheTanelornian t1_iy3yc7x wrote
Reply to comment by Chief_Beef_ATL in Encouraging self-harm to be criminalised in Online Safety Bill by speckz
Yup, my first thought as well.
TheTanelornian t1_jefh8xx wrote
Reply to GM plans to phase out Apple CarPlay in EVs, with Google's help by ouatedephoque
Uh huh, ok well time to phase GM out of any future car choice, then