Thingisby
Thingisby t1_jedprvh wrote
Reply to comment by Altruistic_Day_2332 in Breaking: Premier League clubs agree new rules that can see owners/directors disqualified for “human rights abuses, based on Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020” by dragon8811
They're not from the UAE.
Thingisby t1_jec0dze wrote
Reply to comment by RK4Life in Breaking: Premier League clubs agree new rules that can see owners/directors disqualified for “human rights abuses, based on Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020” by dragon8811
Just for their own crimes.
Thingisby t1_jec09vf wrote
Reply to comment by DunkFaceKilla in Breaking: Premier League clubs agree new rules that can see owners/directors disqualified for “human rights abuses, based on Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020” by dragon8811
This is the big question.
The Saudis aren't on the UKs list for this for example. Make of that what you will.
Thingisby t1_jec052m wrote
Reply to comment by MauricioPochettino in Breaking: Premier League clubs agree new rules that can see owners/directors disqualified for “human rights abuses, based on Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020” by dragon8811
Our owners don't qualify as human rights abusers according to the new law.
I mean obviously they are. But the Saudis are allies so the UK govt have no interest in sanctioning them.
It looks like nothing will happen there.
Out of curiosity why did you kot say Man City?
Thingisby t1_jedxn4i wrote
Reply to comment by Altruistic_Day_2332 in Breaking: Premier League clubs agree new rules that can see owners/directors disqualified for “human rights abuses, based on Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020” by dragon8811
Oh I thought you were talking about the Saudis from PIF. Crack on.