Trimijopulos OP t1_ivg5qck wrote on November 7, 2022 at 6:57 PM Reply to comment by MeatballDom in Is there a moderator or a member of r/history, a historian, or an academic who would accept the challenge to debate the subject of human breeding grounds in the ancient Near East? by Trimijopulos This is the place to discuss History. You do not have the knowledge to decide what is a fringe hypothesis and what is a sound claim when ancient texts are involved. You are doing no good service to History! Permalink Parent 1
Trimijopulos OP t1_ivg3dqe wrote on November 7, 2022 at 6:42 PM Reply to comment by MeatballDom in Is there a moderator or a member of r/history, a historian, or an academic who would accept the challenge to debate the subject of human breeding grounds in the ancient Near East? by Trimijopulos I do not want to play academic, nor do I want to follow the system. I sign with my name and I am looking for someone who has the knowledge (alias balls) to debate on the subject. Permalink Parent 1
Trimijopulos OP t1_ivg0svo wrote on November 7, 2022 at 6:26 PM Reply to comment by MeatballDom in Is there a moderator or a member of r/history, a historian, or an academic who would accept the challenge to debate the subject of human breeding grounds in the ancient Near East? by Trimijopulos >Your own papers are not "published articles" They ARE “published articles” since you can read them. :-) They contain textual evidence proving the existence of the practice of operating human breeding grounds. If you want that evidence in peer-reviewed journals, you’ll have to go look for it. Permalink Parent 1
Is there a moderator or a member of r/history, a historian, or an academic who would accept the challenge to debate the subject of human breeding grounds in the ancient Near East? Submitted by Trimijopulos t3_yout1h on November 7, 2022 at 5:59 PM in history 9 comments 1
Trimijopulos t1_ivb5yhk wrote on November 6, 2022 at 6:02 PM Reply to Simple/Short/Silly History Questions Saturday! by AutoModerator There are the following reports about two kings of antiquity raping their female subjects: The Epic of Gilgamesh Tablet I, column ii, lines 14 - 17 [Yet Gilga]mesh [is the shepherd] of Uruk, the enc[losure]. He is [our shepherd], [strong, handsome, and wise]. [Gilgamesh] leaves no [virgin to her lover], The daughter of a war[rior, the chosen of a noble]! Text in the pyramid of Unas Utterance 317 §510cd Unas is the lord of semen. He takes women away from their husbands to the location of his preference whenever he wishes to. How much historical truth is here? Permalink 2
Trimijopulos OP t1_ivg5qck wrote
Reply to comment by MeatballDom in Is there a moderator or a member of r/history, a historian, or an academic who would accept the challenge to debate the subject of human breeding grounds in the ancient Near East? by Trimijopulos
This is the place to discuss History.
You do not have the knowledge to decide what is a fringe hypothesis and what is a sound claim when ancient texts are involved.
You are doing no good service to History!