UnoChance
UnoChance t1_it4dvw9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in China looked at putting a monitoring satellite in retrograde geostationary orbit via the moon by OkOrdinary5299
"More accurate tracking and characterization of man-made orbiting objects." You can do a lot more at ~0 relative velocity versus ~6 kps though
UnoChance t1_it4cl9o wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in China looked at putting a monitoring satellite in retrograde geostationary orbit via the moon by OkOrdinary5299
Well above or below wouldn't work. If you mean further out then that'd be a bad idea since that's where most graveyard orbits are and if you mean closer in then sure that's possible but positions of GEO satellites do not require space-based detection. There is really no point in doing this unless you were operating like gssap
UnoChance t1_it4ar1l wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in China looked at putting a monitoring satellite in retrograde geostationary orbit via the moon by OkOrdinary5299
Doing it in retro would make it near impossible to safely catalog anything. They just want to have the threat of it being there looming.
UnoChance t1_it4f5r7 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in China looked at putting a monitoring satellite in retrograde geostationary orbit via the moon by OkOrdinary5299
RPO is not a static operation Edit: to expand, that article you sent says that gssap conducts RPO meaning it moves along the belt as you mentioned. Since it is so close it can actually look from more angles in a safer manner than a retro orbit