Veei
Veei t1_jdtvpsg wrote
Reply to AI being run locally got me thinking, if an event happened that would knock out the internet, we'd still have the internet's wealth of knowledge in our access. by Anjz
Can it fully run locally? I thought the AI could but the TTS still needs to contact inet app via API? That’d be awesome if not true.
Veei t1_iylnlcg wrote
Reply to comment by Jayco424 in What Happens When Everyone Realises We Can Live Much Longer? We May Find Out As Soon As 2025 by Shelfrock77
I’m definitely with you in that first half you describe. I have very little faith in humanity, especially in those who have the resources to successfully create AGI and beyond. I doubt their innovations would be made accessible to those without much means (if government agencies didn’t seize it first). I’ve heard some discussions around the thought that we should (or predict we will) stick to ANI (single/narrow purpose AI that we have now). Then there’s many experts that say it’s highly unlikely an AI would choose to help humans. Our track record is not good. Humans are so utterly prone to corruption when given the opportunity. It’s in our nature to define an “other” and divide ourselves. We’re selfish, tribal, conflict-driven pricks.
My guess is most want to (or must) believe in the coming of ASI and LEV simply due to the overwhelming fear of death. I’m in that camp though my cynicism keeps my hope from being anything other than a child’s wishing on a star.
Veei t1_ixfqtor wrote
Reply to comment by SgathTriallair in Expert Proposes a Method For Telling if We All Live in a Computer Program by garden_frog
As someone in the infosec field, knowing that our universe is in fact a contrived system tells me that it is most likely exploitable. Quite a worthwile question to answer, IMO.
Interesting about phenomenalism. Hadn’t heard of that before. So things like the recent article stating our consciousness does not receive input in real time? Not that it proves phenominalism but could help potentially support the idea of phenomenalism or that we are in a simulation.
Philosophy and physics/QM intersect often. I think all of it is very worthwhile to study. You’re not the first I’ve come across that thinks it provides no value knowing but I think it would be useful to prove either way.
Veei t1_ixfk9ap wrote
Reply to comment by SgathTriallair in Expert Proposes a Method For Telling if We All Live in a Computer Program by garden_frog
Good point on any assumptions that rules are the same in the parent but I disagree strongly that knowing whether we are in a sim has no impact on the world. I’m no physicist so can’t really back up my disagreement properly but it would seem very short sighted to think it’s pointless. If we are in a sim, maybe there’s rules/algorithms we can exploit or bypass. It might help us explain some of our observations fully too. I think it’s well worth it to figure out if we are in a sim or not. The subject fascinates me. I would love to find out the answer.
Veei t1_jdtw5m0 wrote
Reply to comment by Anjz in AI being run locally got me thinking, if an event happened that would knock out the internet, we'd still have the internet's wealth of knowledge in our access. by Anjz
That’s way cool. Horizon New Dawn type reboot of civilization, heh. Are there any guides as to how to set up local assistant and TTS, etc?