Veranova
Veranova t1_j4udhqt wrote
Reply to comment by danielv123 in Apple introduces new Mac mini with M2 and M2 Pro — more powerful, capable, and versatile than ever by TbonerT
Given both RAM/SSD are essentially on the same chip with transfer designed to utilise the SSD under the RAM, and a much faster SSD than what you’ll find in other machines, the broader architecture absolutely affects the performance here.
Obviously they’re confusing Arm with Apple Silicon and this is what they meant
Veranova t1_j2wcyo0 wrote
Reply to comment by jseng27 in Report Reveals Wave of New Features for Apple's Mixed-Reality Headset by DarthBuzzard
Especially if it’s actually very good and can work with PCVR (unlikely on that count I guess)
VR is a bit of a minefield of weak offerings still, so enthusiasts will buy anything that’s an improvement
Veranova t1_j2wbqwu wrote
Reply to comment by MayorOfSmurftown in ROG puts 18-inch screens in its latest Strix gaming laptops by Avieshek
r/sffpc awaits. Lots of people build powerhouses and strap on a big screen, then put it in a flight case for travel. At a certain point a laptop of 27” is not more convenient than the flight case solution, you could even just buy an all-in-one pc and a case for it.
Veranova t1_j5tn8zz wrote
Reply to Apple's Cuts SSD Performance for Entry-level 2023 MacBook Pro, M2 Mac Mini by Stiven_Crysis
> The M2 Pro system scored 2929 MBps write and 2703 MBps read using the AJA System Test Lite benchmark. Its M1 Pro-based predecessor scored 3450 Mbps on the write test and 4081 MBps on the read test.
That’s still ludicrously fast.
The tl;dr is the SSD chip configuration is 2 chips vs 4 chips in the larger configuration. Same deal as we saw with some configs last year
Samsung’s 980 NVMe drive by comparison does 3200/2300 in sequential tests