WR_MouseThrow
WR_MouseThrow t1_j0g65gn wrote
Reply to comment by sschepis in A deluge of fake articles threatens research on human genes -- Review: Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills by spontaneous_igloo
This is a pretty outlandish answer when there's a few much more likely reasons to give for results that can't be reproduced. Poor/biased study design or implentation, falsified data, statistical outliers, or just shittily written methods are all more reasonable explanations than... Whatever it is you're suggesting.
WR_MouseThrow t1_iugpk7i wrote
Reply to comment by darthvirgin in The Thing (1982) -- the scene with MaReady checking on Blair in the cabin by darthvirgin
It's not super clear but I think you can infer that the assimilated have a good handle on human behaviour, and that Blair put the noose out as a not-very-subtle threat of "let me back in before I kill myself" (whether he was already assimilated at the time or not).
WR_MouseThrow t1_iso75vl wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The Race to Make a Vaccine for Breast Cancer by AdmiralKurita
There are a few differences between cancer cells and viruses that might account for that.
WR_MouseThrow t1_iso6x1h wrote
Reply to comment by trabso in The Race to Make a Vaccine for Breast Cancer by AdmiralKurita
>Interesting that science assumes cancer is a bad thing
Interesting that you think it's an assumption.
WR_MouseThrow t1_iso3sqy wrote
Reply to comment by gameartist3d in The Race to Make a Vaccine for Breast Cancer by AdmiralKurita
None of those links are to lists of compounds that cure cancer.
WR_MouseThrow t1_j5xvag3 wrote
Reply to comment by RetardGoneDumb in Who's laughing now by RetardGoneDumb
Relevant username lol.