Welcomefriends85

Welcomefriends85 t1_iwxeoue wrote

Reply to comment by Remarkable_Culture97 in Earlier this week by deltapapa1

You have a lot of good ideas and I agree with you, the forest fires in the long run are a good thing. But still..temps are rising. We know we produce a lot of heat the way we make energy. How can this not matter? If controlled burns, deforestation can have an impact, then so can working towards lowering the heat output of our energy making systems

1

Welcomefriends85 t1_iwxbhnw wrote

Reply to comment by Remarkable_Culture97 in Earlier this week by deltapapa1

True, they should plan out proper deforestation and the far left can’t see that clearly, fair enough. But I find it hard to believe that all of a sudden, and in line with warming temps and erratic rainfall, the fires are due purely to too much dense forest. The forest has been the same for many years. The temps are conclusively rising. In CA there were massive fires in semi residential areas, rural areas, sea coast, everywhere, all in line with drought and rising temps. Also, fires in Oregon, Washington, Idaho, Colorado, British Columbia, Alberta, and Australia. Also NASA, on their website, explicitly shows how rising temperatures are largely man made and clearly affecting the climate. I wish it wasn’t true, but there is just so much evidence it seems irresponsible at this point to blame the Left, when the Right outright denies that it could even happen and isn’t happening and will never happen. That’s their position..and it’s wrong

1

Welcomefriends85 t1_iwx6nw2 wrote

Reply to comment by Remarkable_Culture97 in Earlier this week by deltapapa1

But 72 in November is not normal fall now is it? So maybe they have a point. But then again, I just moved to NH less than a year ago from CA, so what do I know? Oh yeah, we had mega sized fires in CA the last five years when that never happened before and now I’m in NH and everyone here can’t believe how long it stayed warm..hmmm..yeah Greta is out of her mind, not you

1