WellHotPotOfCoffee

WellHotPotOfCoffee t1_j9j3kfj wrote

I will address it... Ukraine has dozens of public health laboratories that work to research and mitigate the threats of dangerous diseases. Some of these labs receive financial and other support from the US, the European Union, and the World Health Organization (WHO) - as is the case in many other countries. Despite Russian claims that these are "secret" labs, details of US involvement can be found on the US embassy's website.

I'm curious, does this in your opinion provide a valid reason for the invasion, occupation, and expansion of Russian territory from a sovereign nation?

And for the record, Tony Blair and Bush are War criminals and should be tried as such, but that doesn't change the fact that the foundations and flash points that lead to these wars are vastly different, with vastly different intended outcomes.

1

WellHotPotOfCoffee t1_j9fjter wrote

No, because although it didn't turn out to be true, or at least they weren't found, there was considered to be a genuine threat of WMDs. This coupled with the harboring of Al-Quaeda responsible for one the biggest terrorist attacks we have faced in recent history, gave a fair amount of credibility to such a military operation (what you see now is an invasion - because they plan to occupy and have held "elections" to claim parts as Russia already). Whether you like to believe it or not, these terrorists did actually exist, and there is still some argument that the WMDs did too. This is not to say I agree with what happened and the war again should never have happened. But please enlighten me on how this compares to what is happening in Ukraine...

−6