>Famous horrible criminals People with money have a very odd knack for getting out of prison.

FTFY. It’s not just famous people. The judicial and criminal justice system is otherwise the admission costs to behavior. Epstein and Maxwell were guilty of sex trafficking, who’s guilty of buying that service? DWI’s are for poor people. SEC fines are the costs of doing business for some, while the initial charge will be jail time for others.

In merchandising, that is done for high theft items or when there isn’t shelf space for the entire product (product is stored where cashier grabs it).

For video games, I assumed it was done when there is so much stock it couldn’t fit or for high theft games. I don’t quite know so Best Buy employee, where you at?

The statement wasn’t that single mother households outnumber both parent households. It was that the disproportionate number of mothers might be also due to more single mother households.

All cases of child abuse do not happen in co-parenting households. They mostly occur there, but why is there a difference between single parent households? Specifically, why do more single mothers abuse kids? Those are the questions, damn.

Approximately 80% of all single parents in the U.S. are single mothers.

1 2 3

Please don’t argue for the sake of arguing. Trying to understand who and why people commit child abuse, and how to solve that should be a common agreement.

My hypothesis; this is an article with information that might be used against women. Please allow me to specify; the issue here isn’t just child abuse, but who commits it. Without knowing who or why, it’ll be hard to remedy. However, anyone disingenuous will take this and say “look, another example of fathers and men being disenfranchised!” and that is absolutely not the case.

Anyone to try to understand further or disagree with the disingenuous will be called “abuse excusers” because it helps create the inner dichotomy of “us and them.” Aka basic primate brain shit doing basic primate brain shit.

May I respectfully ask that you copy+paste what you’re referencing?

I think it would be helpful to the discussion to have more info but everything I googled can otherwise be found for free and by clicking the links in the posted article.

It’s not an excuse for abuse. It’s a potential reason there is disproportionate data.

Why do you think understanding disproportionate data equates to excusing violence against children?

They didn’t excuse abuse, they provided potential insight on why there is disproportionate abuse from mothers reported.

Which might make sense when accounting for single parent households. If women, more than not, gain primary custody of children then we should expect higher rates of mothers that abuse their children. Again, it doesn’t excuse abuse. I don’t know where people got this idea.