XtremeTurnip
XtremeTurnip t1_je8q3cj wrote
Reply to comment by Cryptizard in The argument that a computer can't really "understand" things is stupid and completely irrelevant. by hey__bert
>But, you can also convince it that 2+2=5 by telling it that is true enough times.
More to do with how it's been configured.
If your wife tells you it's 5, you say it's 5 too, regardless of prior knowledge.
XtremeTurnip t1_jd2muq9 wrote
Reply to comment by EvilSporkOfDeath in How long till until humanoid bots in supermarkets? by JosceOfGloucester
Pron mostly.
XtremeTurnip t1_jd2mrx6 wrote
XtremeTurnip t1_jcrnnhg wrote
Reply to comment by Whispering-Depths in Midjourney v5 is now beyond the uncanny valley effect, I can no longer tell it's fake by Ok_Sea_6214
moreover because you can't purposefully generate "big bvvoob girl" as for MJ due to ToS.
XtremeTurnip t1_jcrncm5 wrote
Reply to comment by just-a-dreamer- in Midjourney v5 is now beyond the uncanny valley effect, I can no longer tell it's fake by Ok_Sea_6214
That's just one image out of the blue.
In terms of render, sure.
But if you have a specific design in mind, good luck generating it with AI, same if you want to make a character coherent through multiple iterations.
The artist that makes either one of those is fine, the artist that makes the same shit as everyone else might be in trouble.
XtremeTurnip t1_jcrleze wrote
Reply to comment by throwaway_890i in Midjourney v5 is now beyond the uncanny valley effect, I can no longer tell it's fake by Ok_Sea_6214
It's interesting that it's very frequently 5 fingers and a thumb (at least it feels to me). Intuitively 1 less should be roughly as frequent as 1 more, and the further you go the rarest, but i rarely see hands with only 3 fingers (or biased). I'll have to look into it.
edit: typo
XtremeTurnip t1_je8rg6m wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in The argument that a computer can't really "understand" things is stupid and completely irrelevant. by hey__bert
>aphantasmagoria
That would be aphantasia.
I have the personal belief that they can produce images but they're just not aware of it because the process is either too fast or they wouldn't call it "image". I don't see (pun intended) how you can develop or perform a lot of human functions without : object permanence, face recognition, etc.
But most people say it exists so i must be wrong.
That was a completely unrelated response, sorry. On your point i think Feynman did the experiment with a colleague of his where they had to count and one could read at the same time and the other one could talk or something, but none could do what the other one was doing. Meaning that they didn't had the same representation/functionning but had the same result.
edit : i think it's this one or part of it : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cj4y0EUlU-Y