_OBAFGKM_
_OBAFGKM_ t1_j226apu wrote
Reply to comment by TheLuminary in ELI5: If astronomers use "light-years" for interstellar distances, why do we use AU for interplanetary distances instead of "light-minutes"? by concorde77
It's not really like that, since tau and pi only differ by a factor of 2.
A useful equation is, for example d = 1/p, where distance is measured in parsecs and p is measured in arcseconds. If you used meters, it's not just a factor of 2, it's something like 3.086×10^(16) d = 1/p. With distances as big as parsecs, there's no intuition you can use to understand the size, so it really doesn't matter what unit you use. It just makes the most sense to use the natural unit instead of the arbitrary one
_OBAFGKM_ t1_j21mqnz wrote
Reply to comment by TheLuminary in ELI5: If astronomers use "light-years" for interstellar distances, why do we use AU for interplanetary distances instead of "light-minutes"? by concorde77
it's defined as the average distance
_OBAFGKM_ t1_j20zyl4 wrote
Reply to comment by TheLuminary in ELI5: If astronomers use "light-years" for interstellar distances, why do we use AU for interplanetary distances instead of "light-minutes"? by concorde77
metric is actually fairly arbitrary. AU and pc are so much more useful in astronomy because they're derived from actual physical quantities that affect the measurements we make. it's so so easy to write down fundamental astronomical equations in terms of parsecs, whereas if you used metric you would need to include some sort of conversion factor
_OBAFGKM_ t1_j20n6h9 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ELI5: If astronomers use "light-years" for interstellar distances, why do we use AU for interplanetary distances instead of "light-minutes"? by concorde77
> Light minutes, on the other hand, are a unit of time, not distance. They are used to measure the time it takes for light to travel a certain distance. For example, it takes about 8 minutes for light to travel from the Sun to the Earth, so the distance from the Sun to the Earth is about 8 light minutes
You've contradicted yourself in this paragraph. Light minutes are not a measurement of time, they're a measurement of distance. You know this intuitively because you explained it correctly the final sentence here
Astronomers don't use light minutes within the solar system because they don't really care about light within the solar system, AU is just a more convenient unit.
_OBAFGKM_ t1_j1ta1r7 wrote
Reply to comment by vinelliott in eli5 YouTube Dislike information. by yellowxstone
This isn't an explanation, so I can't post it as a top-level comment, so I'm going to borrow yours
> It still calculates them
This is true, and there actually exist extensions for both Firefox and Chrome (and other chromium-based browsers) that return the dislike counters. If anyone reads this and happens to want the dislikes back, go looking for an extension called "return youtube dislikes"
_OBAFGKM_ t1_j1al5n9 wrote
If your driverless train fails, it slowly comes to a stop on the tracks and everyone gets out. If your pilotless plane fails, you've got 200+ people dead.
_OBAFGKM_ t1_iwvpggh wrote
_OBAFGKM_ t1_iuhgypu wrote
Reply to comment by ekkidee in ELI5 On the first day of fall does the sun take the same route through the sky everywhere? by bringthelight2
I don't think that's quite right. The Earth is still tilted, just sideways with respect to the sun. So, for example, at the vernal equinox, the sun would just slightly to the north and set just slightly to the south
_OBAFGKM_ t1_iuh3es9 wrote
Reply to ELI5 On the first day of fall does the sun take the same route through the sky everywhere? by bringthelight2
> But does the sun take the same path through the sky if the observer is on the North Pole vs the Equator?
No: if you're on the equator the sun will be directly overhead, if you're at the north pole the sun will always be in the southern part of the sky.
> Also, is there any day / location where the sun rises directly in the east, goes directly overhead, and then sets directly in the west?
The closest you could get to this is being exactly on the equator during an equinox. It's still not perfect, the tilt of the earth makes what you're describing impossible, but it's pretty close.
_OBAFGKM_ t1_iu1cwql wrote
Reply to ELI5: How is every point the the universe the centre of the universe? by Head-Plankton-7799
Key point: this is referring to the observable universe
Light travels at a speed and the universe has an age. How far away we're able to see is determined by how long the light has had to reach us. Our observable universe is a sphere with a radius of 93 billion light years. if you travelled a billion light years away from earth, you would still only be able to see a sphere around you with a radius of 93 billion light years. Your observable universe would look different but it would be the same size and it would be centered on you no matter where you went.
_OBAFGKM_ t1_j2e104i wrote
Reply to ELI5: How come when you jump inside a moving subway, you land where you are, but if you jump on the roof of the subway, the subway quickly passes under you? by [deleted]
air inside the train car moves with the train car, air outside the train car does not.
if you're standing on the roof, you've got some friction to hold you in place against the air rushing past. jumping while on top of the roof causes all that rushing air to smash into you totally unimpeded, pushing you back