abaoabao2010

abaoabao2010 t1_j1zs557 wrote

Pro tip: statistics cares not about anecdotal cases, as long as there's a high correlation between two different things.

Using your logic, you can arrive at stupid conclusions like: getting stabbed is good for your longevity, because there's these two people, one of whom got stabbed but is still alive today, but the other was killed by a car last year while never getting stabbed.

25

abaoabao2010 t1_ixqq5rz wrote

It actually has, and always will.

For example, peer review is essentially crowd censorship of shitposts, but specifically by people in the field. That's why papers that you can find are usually more reliable than random twitter posts.

37

abaoabao2010 t1_ixqpu34 wrote

People are dumb.

People vote with their wallets.

Studying the behaviors of dumb people is not just real science, it's extremely impactful science.

24