admirelurk t1_ja9wy95 wrote on February 27, 2023 at 10:28 PM Reply to comment by bitemenow999 in [D] What do you think of this AI ethics professor suggestion to force into law the requirement of a license to use AI like chatGPT since it's "potentially dangerous"? by [deleted] I counter that many developers of ML have a too narrow definition of what constitutes danger. Sure, chatGPT will not go rogue and start killing people, but the technology affects society in much more subtle ways that are hard to predict. Permalink Parent 6
admirelurk t1_ja9wy95 wrote
Reply to comment by bitemenow999 in [D] What do you think of this AI ethics professor suggestion to force into law the requirement of a license to use AI like chatGPT since it's "potentially dangerous"? by [deleted]
I counter that many developers of ML have a too narrow definition of what constitutes danger. Sure, chatGPT will not go rogue and start killing people, but the technology affects society in much more subtle ways that are hard to predict.