beeen_there
beeen_there t1_j0m7hd7 wrote
Reply to comment by monsieuryuan in Predictive Artificial Intelligence by Final-Cause9540
> I just understand why they give artificial intelligence that moniker
its called marketing
beeen_there t1_j0ckc5u wrote
Reply to comment by monsieuryuan in Predictive Artificial Intelligence by Final-Cause9540
Not feelings, feel - different from emotion, if you're creative you'd know what that was. Do you? Paint or compose or write or cook or whatever?
Are you seriously asking me the difference between experience and wisdom? How about you start with a dictionary, then have a think, then come back if you still don't know.
I don't call anyone who disagrees with me a tech zealot, but there is this tech intensity in some people that is like religious fervour, and as such completely misses the main points.
beeen_there t1_j0boped wrote
Reply to comment by monsieuryuan in Predictive Artificial Intelligence by Final-Cause9540
> AI totally has the potential to achieve.
It really doesn't. But you're obviously in religous faith mode here, a techzealot. Otherwise you wouldn't try to claim experience and wisdom are one and the same, or feel and emotions are one and the same. That demonstrates a incredibly superficial understanding of all those.
An understanding very similar to AI or a bot. An impression of understanding.
beeen_there t1_j0bgib8 wrote
Reply to comment by M0romete in Predictive Artificial Intelligence by Final-Cause9540
what, like the techzealot misconception that statistics, math and a set of complicated instructions somehow = intelligence?
No point in arguing over semantics, but imho its obvious enough that human experience, wisdom, feel and emotion are essential to intelligence. And computers don't have those.
They can imitate intelligent output, but they are not intelligent.
beeen_there t1_j0bd9yy wrote
Reply to comment by M0romete in Predictive Artificial Intelligence by Final-Cause9540
>you can’t just say AI is statistics or math.
well of course you can
beeen_there t1_j0bd84r wrote
Reply to comment by TopicRepulsive7936 in Predictive Artificial Intelligence by Final-Cause9540
speak for yourself!
beeen_there t1_j09qct2 wrote
Reply to comment by TrekForce in Predictive Artificial Intelligence by Final-Cause9540
Can we just stop confusing vast datasets plus instuctions for output with intelligence please?
OK? Happy now?
beeen_there t1_j09fimw wrote
Reply to Predictive Artificial Intelligence by Final-Cause9540
Can we just stop confusing vast datasets with intelligence please?
beeen_there t1_iyf9536 wrote
Reply to TIL Soren Kierkegaard's first publish work was a panned review of Hans Christian Andersen. It ignited a life-long feud between the two Danes. Andersen responded by caricaturing the existentialist in "The Galoshes of Fortune," where Kierkegaard is portrayed as an annoying parrot who makes no sense. by Rowan-Trees
Fairy tale culture wars. Yawn
They all lived died happily ever after
beeen_there t1_iyf5iie wrote
Reply to comment by VirtualTools_ in Scientists Made a Video Game That Boosts Short-Term Memory in Older Adults by Joe_Anselm
apart from all that slaughter
beeen_there t1_iyf2527 wrote
Reply to comment by BornAgainBlue in Scientists Made a Video Game That Boosts Short-Term Memory in Older Adults by Joe_Anselm
: (
science is just the new, improved new&improved these days
beeen_there t1_ixp9pzs wrote
Reply to my fish tank is too big for the table it's on. how can i adjust to support the weight? by ricky_pepsi
Flimsier fish?
beeen_there t1_ixp0219 wrote
Reply to TIL the first media report about the shift from lighters to the cellphone was a U2 concert in Chicago in 2005. by PlasterBaby
About twenty years after U2's shift from lighters to cellphones.
beeen_there t1_ixozvbx wrote
Reply to TIL the 2026 World Cup will be the first Cup to host 48 teams instead of the usual 32. by hcbaron
As long as nobody's queer, or a boozer, that's all football eh?
beeen_there t1_iwvt496 wrote
Reply to ‘Full-on robot writing’: the artificial intelligence challenge facing universities | Australian universities by Gari_305
>In 2012, computer theorist Ben Goertzel proposed what he called the “robot university student test”, arguing that an AI capable of obtaining a degree in a same ways as a human should be considered conscious.
Conscious!
Hysterical - an AI getting a degree on this basis is plagiarism by way of datasets, so it wouldn't even get the degree, never mind be conscious.
beeen_there t1_irej0sn wrote
Reply to comment by izumi3682 in SMART Protocol Extends Silicon Qubit' Coherence by 100x - Still less computing time than an eye blink. by izumi3682
Thanks for the story. Glad you survived and are surviving dude. Please point that intelligence towards peace and improving these shocking statistics.
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/increased-military-suicides-arent-necessarily-about-war/
Good luck to you
beeen_there t1_irad0ow wrote
Reply to comment by izumi3682 in SMART Protocol Extends Silicon Qubit' Coherence by 100x - Still less computing time than an eye blink. by izumi3682
ok, but realise using quotes from mass murderers is likely to give a negative slant to the tech
beeen_there t1_ir5elrh wrote
Reply to SMART Protocol Extends Silicon Qubit' Coherence by 100x - Still less computing time than an eye blink. by izumi3682
Schwartzkopf "solutions" aren't a great analogy for quantum theory progression
beeen_there t1_j0ql5ou wrote
Reply to Google introduces end-to-end encryption for Gmail on the web by psychothumbs
bit late for all that!