beeen_there

beeen_there t1_j0ckc5u wrote

Not feelings, feel - different from emotion, if you're creative you'd know what that was. Do you? Paint or compose or write or cook or whatever?

Are you seriously asking me the difference between experience and wisdom? How about you start with a dictionary, then have a think, then come back if you still don't know.

I don't call anyone who disagrees with me a tech zealot, but there is this tech intensity in some people that is like religious fervour, and as such completely misses the main points.

−1

beeen_there t1_j0boped wrote

> AI totally has the potential to achieve.

It really doesn't. But you're obviously in religous faith mode here, a techzealot. Otherwise you wouldn't try to claim experience and wisdom are one and the same, or feel and emotions are one and the same. That demonstrates a incredibly superficial understanding of all those.

An understanding very similar to AI or a bot. An impression of understanding.

−1

beeen_there t1_j0bgib8 wrote

what, like the techzealot misconception that statistics, math and a set of complicated instructions somehow = intelligence?

No point in arguing over semantics, but imho its obvious enough that human experience, wisdom, feel and emotion are essential to intelligence. And computers don't have those.

They can imitate intelligent output, but they are not intelligent.

−2

beeen_there t1_iwvt496 wrote

>In 2012, computer theorist Ben Goertzel proposed what he called the “robot university student test”, arguing that an AI capable of obtaining a degree in a same ways as a human should be considered conscious.

Conscious!

Hysterical - an AI getting a degree on this basis is plagiarism by way of datasets, so it wouldn't even get the degree, never mind be conscious.

3