bob4apples

bob4apples t1_j1r8oyy wrote

> Shouldn't this be immediately obvious to everyone?

Why would it be? You yourself say that the advice is wrong as often as it is right and:

  1. Most people have never experienced worst case road conditions and most of those think they have.

  2. Some people have never NOT used GPS for a long drive.

  3. Some people have AWD or FWD and figure it'll get them through anything (see 1).

0

bob4apples t1_j1qw6e1 wrote

The point here was that in heavy snow it is generally better to stick to roads that are being cleared, salted, or sanded. Since navigation only knows traffic and not road conditions, it may try to direct you onto (rural) roads that are impassible by your vehicle.

12

bob4apples t1_iro7xco wrote

Generally illegal contracts are unenforceable. Ostensibly, the law is not intended to help secure ill gotten gains.

This is a weird one because pot isn't very illegal. If the landlord had gone to the state court, this wouldn't be an issue. At the state level it is legal to possess, buy and sell weed. Dispensaries are just another tenant.

However, the landlord went to federal court. In federal court, it is NOT legal to possess, buy or sell weed. In fact, it is illegal to even rent to "dealers".

Which brings up the question. If the federal judge rules that the contract is enforceable then he's ruling that it is legal.

1