burritoace
burritoace t1_jea6s96 wrote
Completely braindead response from the PG editorial board. How surprising!
burritoace t1_je9jig0 wrote
Reply to comment by jonathanabuckle942 in Train derailment in butler by thedudeabides412
Congress broke their strike, albeit with some concessions to the workers
burritoace t1_je5rb2d wrote
Reply to comment by Gnarlsaurus_Sketch in Yo! When’s your first grass cut gonna happen this year? by Pancake108
Very funny to look down your nose at people who mow their lawn while also playing golf
burritoace t1_je5r7j1 wrote
Reply to comment by ventorun in Yo! When’s your first grass cut gonna happen this year? by Pancake108
Just more of your usual reactionary outrage
burritoace t1_je2wn64 wrote
Reply to comment by Lost_Planchet-te in They’re Dealing With the Boat Finally by KawaiiFive0h
That's a logical full-of-sea
burritoace t1_jdzk4ma wrote
Reply to comment by lostcause412 in An abandoned boat on the North Shore is creating an eyesore, but removing it is complicated by Aggravating_Foot_528
It shouldn't be this hard but you misunderstand the sticking points here
burritoace t1_jdyiaep wrote
Reply to comment by lostcause412 in An abandoned boat on the North Shore is creating an eyesore, but removing it is complicated by Aggravating_Foot_528
Thanks for offering to pay up!
burritoace t1_jdf35qs wrote
Reply to comment by anotherlibertarian in PPS board wants an alternative to using safety grant funds to train more school police by throwaway01002030405
Man shut up with this dog shit
burritoace t1_jd78360 wrote
Reply to comment by Swanhollow in Let's pour one out for the developers of Pittsburgh by PublicCommenter
If the developers get so far down the road on a project of this size without reviewing it for general compliance with the zoning code then they are incompetent and deserve to lose that money. The city is not going to block projects that are generally compliant, they want the development to occur too. The reviews are about making changes at the margins, ensuring compliance with all city requirements, etc.
burritoace t1_jd77ukm wrote
Reply to comment by Moogottrrgr in Let's pour one out for the developers of Pittsburgh by PublicCommenter
It doesn't seem like that's what they are trying to tell you
burritoace t1_jd77sgh wrote
Reply to comment by ktxhopem3276 in Let's pour one out for the developers of Pittsburgh by PublicCommenter
If there aren't specific rent caps associated with a project then it's a profit grab
burritoace t1_jd77hi3 wrote
Reply to comment by pittlawyer in Let's pour one out for the developers of Pittsburgh by PublicCommenter
The process needs to be expedited and simplified but it is still important, and the developers don't deserve the benefit of the doubt here. I think it also makes sense for them to be a large funding source for the department. This fee may well be too high but I think the proper number is closer to the new fee than the old. And the fact that the city is again going to be subject to onerous legal proceedings over something like this is bullshit - another case of developers overpowering the city through sheer wealth. If it's so onerous the city should feel those effects in declining development, not bullshit legal wrangling. That's an additional cost for everyone, but the developers don't give a shit about that!
The review is also more complex than that, often requiring ZBA and CDAP review/approval outside of the normal staff review (which also includes cross-referencing with existing city plans, not just reviewing the zoning code).
burritoace t1_jd65e3a wrote
Reply to comment by Willow-girl in Let's pour one out for the developers of Pittsburgh by PublicCommenter
This is some boomer shit
burritoace t1_jd64yoe wrote
burritoace t1_jd64i45 wrote
Reply to comment by pittlawyer in Let's pour one out for the developers of Pittsburgh by PublicCommenter
Big developments are subject to more scrutiny than just basic compliance with the zoning code, and 5 or 6 planets for a city with numerous projects of this scale (and many smaller ones) is too few.
burritoace t1_jd63oam wrote
Reply to comment by Gnarlsaurus_Sketch in Let's pour one out for the developers of Pittsburgh by PublicCommenter
We could marginally slow traffic on a single stretch of road with chicanes or we could marginally slow traffic on many stretches of road with speed bumps. I know which I'd pick! This overheated stuff about their alleged harms does you no favors.
E: I'm no fan of Gainey but this program started under Peduto. Just a very weird thing to get on Gainey's case about.
burritoace t1_jd2a445 wrote
Reply to comment by anatoli_smolin in DA to seek death penalty against man accused of fatally shooting McKeesport officer by OaSoaD
If CO staffs are full of people like this who are itching to kill someone (entirely possible, I don't know) then we've got big problems and maintaining the death penalty as is would surely be a mistake.
burritoace t1_jcz97x3 wrote
Reply to comment by uglybushes in Recycling by iloveallkittykat
If you think recycling paper products is no better than throwing them in the landfill then you really are an idiot. You'd have the beginnings of a point if the topic here was plastics but you haven't bothered to understand what you're talking about at all.
Cardboard is the most recycled material in the US and over 90% is recycled each year. This rate has been above 80% since 2009. It is the material with the strongest argument for recycling!
burritoace t1_jcyzo9z wrote
Reply to comment by uglybushes in Recycling by iloveallkittykat
Oh yea I'll make sure to go to the factory and have my goods packaged in reusable packaging instead of cardboard. Cardboard is extremely recyclable and the actual recycling rate is pretty good. If you can't differentiate between that and other types then you've got no business telling other people how to act on this topic.
burritoace t1_jcxnyef wrote
Reply to comment by Aggravating_Foot_528 in Questions About Tree Removal and Property Lines by Flip3408
Survey should be $500-800 or so, maybe a little more if they flag the corners.
burritoace t1_jcxn89f wrote
Reply to comment by uglybushes in Recycling by iloveallkittykat
This is idiotic. Some recycling is ineffective but not all. Don't make excuses for laziness.
burritoace t1_jaqs139 wrote
Reply to comment by Vivid-Ice4175 in As construction begins on Atlanta’s “Cop City,” Pittsburghers are concerned about an allegedly similar local project by LostEnroute
They don't need this facility to get proper training, and proper training doesn't prevent them from abusing people. Nice try though
burritoace t1_jaqruix wrote
Reply to comment by anonymouspoliticker in As construction begins on Atlanta’s “Cop City,” Pittsburghers are concerned about an allegedly similar local project by LostEnroute
Are you kidding? Basically every public institution is treated this way. Fuck off with this bullshit.
burritoace t1_jaqr484 wrote
Reply to comment by imouttahereta in As construction begins on Atlanta’s “Cop City,” Pittsburghers are concerned about an allegedly similar local project by LostEnroute
If you don't think the pandemic fucked up supply chains then you're an idiot
burritoace t1_jeb3gvj wrote
Reply to comment by sopabe6197 in Where do you go for car inspections? by pghgreatest
You should get your car inspected like the rest of us