bustervich
bustervich t1_iyaf1bu wrote
Reply to comment by UnCommonSense99 in Rolls-Royce successfully tests hydrogen-powered jet engine by je97
The real problem with future propulsion is about energy density. Find something as energy dense as petrochemicals* and you’ll be the next bazillionaire.
*No I don’t mean nuclear powered planes.
bustervich t1_itoegn5 wrote
Reply to Are typos supposed to be so common in books? Or am I just ending up getting poorly edited ones? by rabidpiano86
I’ve noticed this recently too! I got a new copy of the book Jurassic Park and there are some typos so bad that I just couldn’t figure out what was trying to me conveyed.
It inspired me to dig through some old boxes in the attic to find my hard cover copy that I got in the 90s and the typos are not in the original one! Somehow a book printed more than 20 years after the original edition has more typos in it!
bustervich t1_iyb0u2n wrote
Reply to comment by Master_Bayters in Rolls-Royce successfully tests hydrogen-powered jet engine by je97
Designing a plane that could fly on nuclear power has been tried before early in the nuclear age. I don’t know if technology exists today to make it practical, but making it safe in the event of a crash is another story.
People generally think of black boxes on planes as indestructible, and they are pretty tough. But they’re good for protecting a few memory chips from impact and thermal forces. But even though the boxes are in the tail and designed so that the entire front of the plane acts as a crumple zone, there have been crashes where the black boxes were never found, even though the crash location was known and on land. Now imagine trying to build a containment vessel for some sort of reactor that can keep a plane crash from turning into a dirty bomb while also being light enough to be flown on a plane that also has to carry passengers and cargo.