ceelo71
ceelo71 t1_j6s9tkm wrote
Reply to [OC] Manchester United Income and Expenses Breakdown of their 2022 Annual Report by Square_Tea4916
Where are the dividends for investors? Is that under Employee Benefits or Financing Costs?
ceelo71 t1_j6l2asv wrote
Reply to comment by RodeoBob in ELI5: What does it mean when a company buys back stocks and why is it frowned upon? by lilly_kilgore
Profit extraction over value creation
ceelo71 t1_j5157gy wrote
Reply to comment by dryingsocks in Is there any difference in efficacy when a vaccine is administered somewhere other than the upper arm (e.g. on the foot)? by MercurioLeCher
That’s an interesting difference in practice. If a patient needs an IV bolus of a medication, does the physician also do that or is it delegated to a nurse?
ceelo71 t1_j50ahuf wrote
Reply to comment by LiquidPizza in Is there any difference in efficacy when a vaccine is administered somewhere other than the upper arm (e.g. on the foot)? by MercurioLeCher
Agreed, physicians are definitely capable of giving an IM shot, but rarely do. This may have been a thing a long time ago, but is not done (at least in the US) currently. Source - have been a practicing physician for twenty years.
It’s like starting an IV - the only docs that are good at that are anesthesiologists. They even know how to set up the pumps, mix IV meds, etc. if someone were crashing and needed an IV and infusion started, and I was the only one there to do it, the prognosis would be poor.
ceelo71 t1_j504e5m wrote
Reply to comment by dryingsocks in Is there any difference in efficacy when a vaccine is administered somewhere other than the upper arm (e.g. on the foot)? by MercurioLeCher
Honestly doctors don’t give shots. Nurses are much better trained and I would trust them over a doctor
ceelo71 t1_j6syhfm wrote
Reply to comment by Square_Tea4916 in [OC] Manchester United Income and Expenses Breakdown of their 2022 Annual Report by Square_Tea4916
I understand that the Glazers stopped taking dividends in the second half of 2022 due to the optics, but I imagine they are still paying those out to shareholders. Interesting that a business that lost over £100 million still has the cash to pay investor dividends.