chefblaze
chefblaze OP t1_j6eqj8a wrote
Reply to comment by bad_grahamar in Thoughts on The Baroque Cycle by Neal Stephenson? by chefblaze
I actually like that they are combined. I prefer being able to “binge read” a series as opposed to having to read other stuff while waiting for the next book to come out (if they aren’t all available)
chefblaze OP t1_j6eq38m wrote
Reply to comment by mediadavid in Thoughts on The Baroque Cycle by Neal Stephenson? by chefblaze
Thanks! Seems to be a common suggestion. I’ll check the local library for it!
chefblaze OP t1_j6epsuh wrote
Reply to comment by Tiasthyr in Thoughts on The Baroque Cycle by Neal Stephenson? by chefblaze
Thanks! I’ll check that out and am definitely becoming more interested in reading these!
chefblaze OP t1_j6dgusb wrote
Reply to comment by sarcastr0naut in Thoughts on The Baroque Cycle by Neal Stephenson? by chefblaze
All that stuff definitely interest me and has me leaning toward using these to get me back into reading. As far as the size of them, it’s not issue. I do prefer longer books as long as they keep me sucked in.
chefblaze OP t1_j6dgbxx wrote
Reply to comment by badideas1 in Thoughts on The Baroque Cycle by Neal Stephenson? by chefblaze
Too much meandering and drawn-out, dry explanations/descriptions is one of the things is one of the possible setback I was thinking about. At least over such a long series.
chefblaze t1_ivmfqsa wrote
Reply to Detail 20 (my artwork) by Danny_Ingrassia_Art
Looks like the red door from The Haunting of Hill House.
chefblaze OP t1_j6eqs6g wrote
Reply to comment by denimcat2k in Thoughts on The Baroque Cycle by Neal Stephenson? by chefblaze
I hear ya. There were a couple books I tried reading when I was younger and figured I’d go back to them eventually.