starlink is too expensive and subject to too much human uncertainty, when it comes to fiber: there are areas not covered

very good question ! In fact, this will be one of the last bequests of the sovereign state: the quality of the Telecom infrastructure and its resilience. For the AI and these dependencies to work, you need, among other things, cheap data, even free data, so efficient and amortized structures, only a strong sovereign state can make the ISPs bend. If a sovereign state has solved this problem, the very concept of megalopolis is dead

APIs are open source , worst case MIT licenses , you can make your ChatGPT Stallman compatible , but you will have to use copyrighted hardware and GPU drivers , both Nvidia wins

As much typed in the API control, it's simpler isn't it? asked that Google make an identifier when we download TensorFlow, same for meta and PyTorch, the model is a result, a purpose, as much "regulated" the API, but we touch copyright etc.

In the deep tech startup environment, Chat GPT is seen as a divine surprise, it replaces both a junior dev, the marketing department, the graphic designer, etc. This avoids hiring, even on a freelance contract. Then Microsoft clearly wants the skin of Google, I am old enough to have known the Microsoft killer of Netscape and savior of Apple. Between trying out Chat GPT and its surprise rollout in Bing and Edge, they only go there if they're sure to damage Mountain View.
We haven't seen it all yet, I'm hoping for big things

OK, I think we're speeding up.

I agree , but , AI , in education : no . We all see, it's about five minutes on Facebook and/or Twitter, to see that the grade level, collapses, but if you add the ChatGPT crutch, you put the educational process in cold storage, because of its blatant uselessness and these engineers, these thinkers, these creators that we need, will not exist, because there will be no more education, this one is not only for math, history, geography, but to create independent citizens, not consumers

It's normal, the students must learn by themselves

Okay, so I'm going to simplify: I can't call it art, because these "works" not of affect, are "created" by "individuals" endowed with sensitivity.

First, I don't call it art, it's more wallpaper generators. Secondo, why don't I call it art? I haven't seen Botticelli, Da Vinci, see Ingres. These generators mix different influences, but do not include them. A freshman, understands him.

The only advantage I see is that it can give very interesting starting bases

Good news at last

The M series is a generation or two slower compared to the Nvidia GPU

Hello, in fact to answer you, the fiction has already been made. The nation-state was the first casualty of COVID 19. Private corporations have taken the place of unflinching states in 2020 and the world has never been calm.

Then, on a personal note: politics and its personnel has become as obsolete as the notions of right and left, nationalist and anti-fascist. The policy has failed, the mega corporation(s) are on the way to success.

Again read William Gibson's first trilogy and Charles Stross' accelerando

already not counting on the governors, it is bad for health (joke); Salvation will come from deep tech companies, from those who will succeed GAFAM; I have high hopes for the metaverse, especially with climate change. AI is already among us, for basic tasks.
But there are two levels to cross:
Better management of rare earths
All-round optimization of computer hardware

there will be two / three paths for man: the artistic, the artisanal and the pure knowledge

Transhumanism, like AIG, we are not going to cut it, but once again, the politicians, via "popular" opinion and other manipulators, who came to call it "satanism", it will happen, not 2023 will not be two days before, there will always be obscurantists and reactionaries.

the concern is more technical than anything else, because of the necessary resources allocated and then Hollywood via the trustees of actors, screenwriters will do a lobbying fight, I dare not imagine in France

you have to start somewhere ... you have to be indulgent

>Definitely. Crime may never go away, but our ability to detect and respond to it is improving.
>
>AGI security guards and police are going to be interesting. AGI criminals may be a thing as well. We may see an arms race between the two.

This has already been the case in the past, up to a certain point: seeing the ignorance, it seems, of street corner kids with the link of video surveillance, facial detection etc. yes, there is ethics, but deep learning should not be accused of racism, it only grinds data, it is the cause, not the program

>Crime is decreasing in civilization when you zoom out.
>
>This is because civilization has been becoming increasing interconnected at an exponential rate, since humans first evolved facial expressions and emotional vocal noises. The is the same path that single celled organisms used to evolve into more complex multi-cellular organisms. First they transmitted data to each other, then the data they transferred increased in bandwidth, accuracy, and usefulness.
>
>There's no need to eliminate human beings but we will continue to upgrade ourselves with technology. That technology will continue to improve our co-existence and interoperability, and as the band with between brains continues to increase, our harmony.
>
>TLDR: Communication bandwidth go up, Crime go down

at worst controllable: see season 3 of Westworld, kui presents this in a "soft" way

>Good point. I was just speculating on future technology when the singularity occurs

the singularity will not appear "by magic", but when there will be a correlation of computing power / lower prices / invisibilization of deep learning / infinitesimal cost of data storage

>If people have implants, they will be tracked everywhere they go, probably as a trade-off for all the instantaneous information. For a Utopian perspective, that’ll drastically reduce crime, but on a dystopian level, it will surrender freedom of choice. Which is your preference?

No need for an implant: there is the smartphone

>Countries where the citizens are well-educated and healthy have less crime, and with greater technology (including medicine), people are going to become smarter and healthier than ever before, so while I'll probably get criticized for saying something so utopian, I'll say it anyway:
>
>I think that the singularity will lead to all crime ending this century, within a few decades, and obviously, the sooner that all crime ends, the better it will be for everyone and everything

In the long term , I am of the same opinion , but , but currently , we are in a phase of barbarism , a remake of the fall of Rome , with AI , transhumanism as an attacker and with these entities , the conversation , is not Not possible .

Education is a big topic

a month or two, I love this sub, because it's really the only place where we talked about the singularity, without selling me the latest fashionable programming language or the startup that will revolutionize AI, but so the founders never opened a book on Python or know how to install Linux

I agree on both points: we will go into high-tech professions, both in craftsmanship and in my technologies (this is already the case). But there is a big but: not everyone will be able to go there, be by desire, be by motivation, be by culture, at this level it will be the universal income