dave_hitz
dave_hitz t1_jbbgxw2 wrote
Reply to comment by fish4096 in TIL the largest moon in our solar system, Ganymede, is larger than the planet of Mercury by Jugales
I agree about the clearing. But they'll invent some new rule. "But it's smaller than a moon in the same solar system!"
I have a simpler rule. If it's big and round, it's a planet. Unless it's burning with the flames of a nuclear fire, in which case it's a star.
Some planets go around stars. Some planets go around other planets.
Let the planets proliferate.
dave_hitz t1_jb8diu2 wrote
Reply to TIL the largest moon in our solar system, Ganymede, is larger than the planet of Mercury by Jugales
Don't let the astronomers know. They'll redefine it as a dwarf-moon planet or something.
dave_hitz t1_j5xkkn6 wrote
Reply to comment by IndustrialChiller in TIL star systems are much closer together near the center of the galaxy, with some being only 0.4–0.04 light-years apart by yoguckfourself
I was just trying to be all sciency. Radio may well be better.
dave_hitz t1_j5w1d9t wrote
Reply to TIL star systems are much closer together near the center of the galaxy, with some being only 0.4–0.04 light-years apart by yoguckfourself
So that's where the first interstellar civilizations will form. It's still a long trip, but imagine being able to exchange laser messages in a month, round trip. You can imagine a buzzing web of communication, and much more incentive to try to mount a trip. Wow.
dave_hitz t1_jbfgcfu wrote
Reply to comment by fish4096 in TIL the largest moon in our solar system, Ganymede, is larger than the planet of Mercury by Jugales
Big enough for gravity to squeeze it to round. Most asteroids are odd shaped rocks. They don't count. Get enough rocks to generate enough gravity to pull the rocks into a sphere, then you've got a planet.