dcazdavi
dcazdavi t1_j60k97z wrote
Reply to comment by sickofthisshit in Jail threats stop AI 'robot lawyer' from making its debut in court | Engadget by yourd00m
no one is proposing that this could accomplish the same results as a lawyer and it will likely never reach the same level of emotional capability and guidance; but the alternative for many who cannot afford this help is nothing at all and something is usually better than nothing.
dcazdavi t1_j60jt9t wrote
Reply to comment by sickofthisshit in Jail threats stop AI 'robot lawyer' from making its debut in court | Engadget by yourd00m
a c-level exec of a startup was going to try using it in court to defend against a ticket of his own and he was threatened with legal action if he tried.
many laywers wouldn't bother with such cases and even more cannot afford to seek a lawyer's help; so alternatives are need
dcazdavi t1_j60gsi0 wrote
Reply to comment by sickofthisshit in Jail threats stop AI 'robot lawyer' from making its debut in court | Engadget by yourd00m
public defenders don't need an assistant that can automatically provide help and decipher patterns from every legal source document that's ever been created and available to the public on other case history that's relevant to their current case?
sarcasm is not intended; i'm re-asking the question from the way i understand it.
dcazdavi t1_j60gdb2 wrote
Reply to comment by sickofthisshit in Jail threats stop AI 'robot lawyer' from making its debut in court | Engadget by yourd00m
what other conclusion could a legal layman reach when lawyers have prevented anyone from even trying?
i don't doubt that it couldn't replace a lawyer yet but i has to start somewhere and it's not being allowed to happen at all with no reasons given.
dcazdavi t1_j60c49n wrote
Reply to comment by VincentNacon in Jail threats stop AI 'robot lawyer' from making its debut in court | Engadget by yourd00m
since everyone is down voting this and other similar viewpoints without providing decent arguments; it now makes more sense
dcazdavi t1_j60bts7 wrote
Reply to comment by monchota in Jail threats stop AI 'robot lawyer' from making its debut in court | Engadget by yourd00m
they should give the public defenders free access/use and training on how to use it
dcazdavi t1_j1uyxlp wrote
Reply to comment by are_we_there_bruh in 4th Washington state electrical substation vandalized by Teanaway99
even if they're caught; the police are sympathetic to their plight.
a LOT of them have to be arrested before a good enough apple is involved to hold them accountable.
dcazdavi t1_j1esypc wrote
Reply to comment by outsidetheparty in We can now 3D print as much wood as we want without cutting a single tree by StayAdmiral
hemp isn't the only alternative; i cited it as an example only.
dcazdavi t1_j19tz2m wrote
we've never need to cut down trees when alternatives like hemp are better in every single way; we will continue to cut down trees despite this advancement.
dcazdavi t1_j60mfx3 wrote
Reply to comment by sickofthisshit in Jail threats stop AI 'robot lawyer' from making its debut in court | Engadget by yourd00m
>If it was his ticket, he was just stupid, if it was someone else's ticket, it is unlicensed practice of law, and really bad advice.
with low stakes which is exactly where you start to test something new.
he's fully aware that it's not a lawyer, so unlicensed practice accusations don't make sense and it's a tool whose wielder has to know that any sharp edge tools can also cut you as well; assuming it even gets a chance to become a tool.