doctor_strangecode
doctor_strangecode t1_jc8f5d3 wrote
Let's not tear down the publicly funded station until there's an existing alternative that we like.
Given that we just bailed out Silicon valley bank for around $100B, that should be their free handout for the next decade, and let's build it with public money, as a public resource.
doctor_strangecode t1_jcha6kw wrote
Reply to comment by rocketsocks in NASA wants new 'deorbit tug' to bring space station down in 2030 by DevilsRefugee
A lot of money is being spent to fill in a hole. $200B / 300M population is $600 per American man woman and child. That's a lot.
It's not taxpayers that get hurt, it's "bank customers" that will pay for it, which I'll argue is the same group of people as taxpayers. Hard to pay taxes without a bank.
The money came from FDIC, which backed the bank beyond the limits they apply to other banks. FDIC is funded by a tax/fee on banking, and banks will pass those costs on their customers. And those customers are everyone.
For ISS, we should look at the space shuttle. When the shuttle program ended, congress replaced it with nothing. We had to ride to space with the Russians.