drxdrg08

drxdrg08 t1_jbardx6 wrote

Why don't both of you send a check to cover her expenses?

Doctors aren't going to work for free, and medical equipment costs money. Somebody has to pay for it.

This naive take that everything should be free, and if it's not then it's a grave inhumane injustice is getting old.

−9

drxdrg08 t1_jba2so5 wrote

> Wonder if it was worth all the time they saved not thoroughly inspecting rail cars.

It was. That's how everything works in the world. You find a reasonable medium between cost and benefit.

Do you get a $5,000 PET scan at your routine annual physical? It would very likely find a lot of problems much earlier than otherwise.

Why doesn't every single road have concrete dividers? Why don't cars have 5 point harnesses and roll cages? That would prevent a lot of accident and deaths.

1

drxdrg08 t1_jb6n5t4 wrote

Nobody is even going to look at these books. I don't know what planet you are from, but school libraries were obsolete even before the age of internet. These kids have personal cell phones with internet. They have access to the internet everywhere. If some kid is intent on finding some "sensitive" information, claiming that the school library is their only option is beyond absurd.

−4

drxdrg08 t1_jb69ero wrote

> Censorship within the public schools needs addressed; how we make a difference for students and student learning.

No child was going to check out those books. Not even once. You I know. I know it. Everybody know it. It's just an arbitrary "red line" that both sides are fighting over. It's utterly inconsequential for "student learning".

−13

drxdrg08 t1_jax7sk2 wrote

Maybe ACLU should spend their efforts somewhere else. Like suing someone to change the fact that of kids in the largest school district in the state can't read at grade level?

I thought education was a human right?

Injecting themselves into some situation with a satan club seems like an absurd waste of resources. Kids in Saucon can read.

−5

drxdrg08 t1_jaczl6u wrote

> Anytime an org is called XX for Liberty or something you can assume its goals are exactly opposite the definition of liberty. Kind of like how the more references to democracy and ‘the people’ there are in a country’s name, the less democratic they tend to be.

Does this observation apply to all the initiatives and ideas that include words like "equity", "equality" and the like?

−3

drxdrg08 t1_j9vfcyd wrote

> but it'd be great to see the 1500 millionaires lead the charge to make that number 0.

I'd like to see evidence that there is not enough funding.

> In the academic year 2020 – 2021, 754 students experienced homelessness.

Or even get a definition of what "experienced homelessness" means. Does it include cases where there was a house fire and a family with kids were at a shelter for a few days? Does it include kids that has a fight with their parents and were runaways? How long was the average span of a stay at a shelter?

What they are saying certainly doesn't mean 750 students were homeless for the duration of the whole year.

−22