Just posting criticism because that's more interesting: The problem it's going to encounter, especially based off their video, is human acting is far from exaggerated animation. Animation has a smooth flow to it with intense extremes when wanted. That's something the AI can't really replicate.

I hope so. I'm still waiting for them to accept my invite. But soon as I get it, first thing I'll do is create some llama bots for Reddit and see how effective it is compared to GPT3 posting believable comments. If it's nearly as good, but can be ran locally, it'll completely change the bot game on social media.

No idea... They only allow in published researchers.

Siri was exclusively cloud based for the longest time. They only brought over basic functions to local hardware.

So basically it's fine tuned for this specific topic, where GPT is large because it's a general dataset for multidomain use.

Oh of course... There is still a lot. This breakthrough will probably pay off drastically for the next 10 years. We still have all the fine tuning benefits, as well as squeezing out the benefits of scale. Tons and tons of fruit hanging for a while.

I don't think he understands how S Curves work. We had a major breakthrough when we figured out how to convert micro transistors to work as analogue transistors instead of binary... Which allowed us to pick up where we left off in the 60s

However, all this explosion of growth will probably slow down once the low hanging fruit is all achieved after this breakthrough, and we'll likely top off for a while until we get another breakthrough.

It's definitely not 4. It's just a 3.5 backend with modified fine tuning for being used in a search engine.

What's interesting is someone in your other thread got the same exact to the letter response from Chat GPT. This says 2 things: This is likely the same build as 3.5 on the backend... And there is a formula it's using to get the same exact response.

> The reason we won't have access to this is

I think it's more about people don't have a place to create a room dedicated to medical procedures?

Google's LaMDA already has this theoretically figured out. They've shown over a year ago it's ability to function general tasks like this. And I'm sure they are much further ahead already.

Changing data transfer mediums is the insanely easy part. The hard part is the tech itself. Switching over to a custom secured wireless protocol is just a minor hardware and software change. In the meantime, just use something wireless, and clamp down on security once it's ready for market.

I mean, considering these are all in the early prototype and experimentation phases, I don't think you need to worry about a hacker creating a bespoke virus specifically for the 5 people on the planet who would have one.

I heard a lecture from a big tech CEO (who I wont mention because Reddit hates him and don't want to derail), who believes the future is going to have GPT-style fine tuned models for individuals eventually. To the point that others will simply be able to engage with your AI clone to get 80% of the answers they'd need from you directly, massively increasing productivity. Instead of having to take your time, they can just talk to your AI clone to get guidance or answers. He also believes there will often just be AI to AI conversations, where you can set the topic of conversation and have the two AI's make decisions... Again, with the belief that the AI will be so advanced, the overwhelming majority of times, it'll be incredibly an accurate reflection of real life.

He also theorized that future dating apps will be like this, sort of like that Black Mirror episode. Where we'd have our AI clones just interact with EVERYONE on the app, and then the app would determine who we best get along with, optimizing our matching ability.

We've discovered just how adaptive the brain is when it comes to trying to engage with the outer world. For the most part, the brain will simply make whatever required pathways needed, to adapt to the new tool it's using.

Why is Neuralink the only company who realized they can avoid the massive wires and hardware sticking out of people's head just by using bluetooth? I don't get why so many of these companies still use these bulky fucking wires that look ridiculous when a wireless solution is better for everyone.

It’s wild how a decade ago protein folding was an insane problem to solve. People were waiting together cloud super computers just to solve a single protein. Then 2 years ago Google releases a program that can do any and all folding almost instantly.

Based on what I've heard about Google's AI -- That type of AGI is already there. I don't think any AGI will ever make everyone content as it's a broad moving goal post that's ill defined, and fundamentally digital is going to be different than biological processing, but the AI Google has is really really good. Mostly because it's multiple different types of AIs all networked together, connected to the internet, and can learn novel tasks on demand.

You're not thinking larger. Google searches aren't just things like, "What's the velocity speed required to break gravity?" or "What is the kwh rate in California for the last 10 years?"

People will still use Google, or some future permutation of it. Long as they are using Google, they are feeding them data, which they'll use to deliver ads (probably better than ever). It doesn't have to deliver those ads through Google.com, but in many other ways. They can still deliver your precise answer, but ender that, deliver products that are perfectly optimized to be exactly what you are looking for. If it's something you want to buy, or could potentially buy that you don't know you want yet... All this AI data Google will generate from you using their AI, will be able to deliver ads better than ever.

Say for instance you're a PERFECT candidate for solar panels on your roof. But it's nothing you ever even consider, never been educated on, haven't looked into, and just really aren't interested in it. Google will be able to use your AI searches to get such an intimate understanding of you, to realize, 'Visarga is an amazing cadidate for residential solar and they don't even know it. But they would absolutely love to get solar for their home if they knew more about it. The data shows they absolutely would be thrilled to have this. So we can now find a way to get them in contact with an installer so they can get solar."

That's MASSIVELY valuable for EVERYONE. The installer who wants to not spend time educating everyone, and seeking out ideal candidates, and the consumer who would be thrilled to get this, but has no idea about it. This is what Google already tries, and with the data AI models will be able to deliver, are going to optimize this beyond belief. Sure, you wont get your answer ad on a ChatGPT style interface, but that's probably not what the future of this AI integration is going to look like. It's not going to be some blank interface you're seeing now. It'll be integrated into other things.

People will use google to research and search things... Further, the search engine itself isn't where it needs to deliver ads. It's gathering data on you to figure out what you want and need in that moment, and if it's something to buy, they will use this data to optimally find exactly the most perfect product you are seeking. If anything this level of depth and AI will improve their ad delivery across the web.

You're acting like Google wont know how to adapt and instead just sit around complaining that their old model and way of doing things doesn't work.

Google's models are leaps and bounds beyond OpenAI

It's frustrating that they wont release it, but it's by and large BECAUSE it's so advanced. Google's AI is connected to the internet, so all of its information is up to date, dynamic, and constantly evolving. The very nature of connecting it to the web with constant streams of information pretty much inherently remove most safe guards and leave open tons of room for rapid growth and abuse that Google wont be able to stay ahead of against millions of people using it.

It's also potentially a general AI. It's not just ChatGPT style, but their AI is also connected to EVERYTHING you can imagine. Not just knowledge databases from 2020 and before... It's more closely resembling an actual mind like human's that have tons and tons of different "brains" all working together. You can work with maps, weather data, traffic, breaking news, art, internet of things, you name it. They connect everything in their AI

This is what Google has been working on the past year. It's entirely on improvement and guard rails. But it looks like Google has realized the cat's out of the bag, so they want to bring it to market sooner than later before everyone starts building businesses on the OpenAI framework instead of theirs.

You're complaining about the search results. OpenAI isn't a challenge to their ad model. Getting better search results has nothing to do with ads. No one is clicking through ads looking for information. They are clicking through shitty search results that are SEO packed to the tits, making the whole slew of results be generic AI generated crap.

Google WANTS better search results, that meet the users needs, to drive traffic. OpenAI has massively cornered Google in certain information seeking type searches, which Google wants to tackle right away. Google's ads have absolutely no threat from better search results.

That's what Google has done... It's also connected to the internet. Their AI is fully integrated from end to end, but they refuse to release it because they are concerned about how it would impact everyone. So they are focusing on setting up safety barriers or something.

Like dude, just release it.

That's interesting. I had no idea that it was recoded and rereleased into the wild. Could it have been Israel? It definitely doesn't sound like something the US would do. Maybe Iran after discovering it tried to repurpose it?

I was always under the impression that it got out because the original attack vector was via a USB with some boss's naked wife on their, incentivizing him to bring it into the office... Then they also brought it out

No idea on the specifics but all I got out of it was that it leveraged the same sort of mechanism. I think I recall reading something about using peptides to activate it? I could be wrong.