For a grammar nazi you should learn the difference between "what" and "which".

Lol, if you think they are communist then you really shouldn't be giving any advice.

That's twice as big as the one in this picture!?

What's the definition of plagiarism that you are using? Merriam Webster says "to use words that were not your own without crediting the source". To me that perfectly describes what I said.

If the work is attributed to the AI it's not plagiarism. If someone tries to say they write it when an AI did, that's plagiarism. Plagiarism is when you try to pass off work you didn't write as your own writing.

Wow, you are saying if the dice are warped they no longer behave like perfect dice!? Incredible insight. /s

Iirs way worse than that. It's more like taking a picture of a restaurant and thinking you could go recreate the restaurant and dishes.

Yes, in general. As long as the human is accurate most of the time, the ML model will take the errors as outliers and outperform the human. The AI is generally finding trends in the data and then using those trends to predict future points. As long as the human tagging is accurate enough to get the true trend across, the AI can outperform them. It's important to understand that an AI model will perform DIFFERENTLY than a human, for better or worse, since it uses different processes. Some mistakes that a human makes, the AI would not make, but there are mistakes a human might not make that the AI will make.