Commentary on the over reliance of “expert at google says” as a means of establishing credibility, especially since this guy doesn’t even work there anymore as you noted. “Experts at Google” in particular have been wrong about a billion things recently and it’s reflected in their patriarchal stance on AI tools, the fact that it’s become a parasitic ad company and the fact that it can’t compete with ChatGPT and ChatGPT-like services because no one who works there anymore is either capable of or allowed to actually innovate unless it involves dicking with the SEO algorithm to continue to toxify the internet with shit spam nonsense content instead of actual information made by people.

You know maybe there are people at Google that don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about, perhaps.

This guy could have been talking to a meatball and come to the same end.

Now people can finally talk about trump on facebook. Whew.

How about a law that you can’t fire more than 1000 people at a time without getting rid of the CEO too?

In my experience a minor speed improvement for a major range reduction. Speed was already good enough.

What if I told you they can add a number in front of the G any time they want to sell you slightly different shit?

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=_uTZWaJU6ho

Japan is working to produce hydrogen as a byproduct of their new meltdown-proof nuclear reactors. It actually may be a new era re: hydrogen generation, because yes, in the 2010s it was incredibly foolhardy to bother electrically creating hydrogen to convert it back to running an electric motor when you could just use electricity directly. This video is three weeks old, so maybe things are changing?