fursten123
fursten123 t1_j3yk0l9 wrote
Reply to comment by Light01 in Philosophy has never been the detached pursuit of truth. It’s always been deeply invested in its own cultural perspective. by IAI_Admin
Well, I do think there are general basis for happyness, and other phenomena that can be shared intersubjectively.
Isnt maslows basic needs or jungs personalitytraits, if not science at least good philosophy based on a set of generalities shared by most people?
fursten123 t1_ivws172 wrote
Reply to comment by incorrectphilosopher in Interview with David Pearce, freelance philosopher, expert in hedonism... by fatsosis
I msged u
fursten123 t1_ivvdijl wrote
Reply to comment by incorrectphilosopher in Interview with David Pearce, freelance philosopher, expert in hedonism... by fatsosis
Just msg, i could need someone to reflect with.
fursten123 t1_jb0cr03 wrote
Reply to Wittgenstein’s Revenge (this genuinely changed the way I look at the world) by ElliElephant
Interesting take, although i would say this applies more to the soft sciences than hard sciences. Hard science can use instruments that meassure generally on a materialist basis while social sciences put out logical systems of ideas based on social phenomena; meaning that innovation from a capitalist view in relation to a wellbeing and health from a socialist point of view is a matter of prioritization in the tribe u belong to - and therefor u trust a political "fact" based on the tribe (or blockchain) u belong to.