gcappaert
gcappaert OP t1_jbfghsx wrote
Reply to comment by myspicename in [OC] U.S. Laws that Changed the Name of a Post Office by gcappaert
It's a percentage of enacted legislation, not a percentage of post offices. I think I made the axis labels too small!
gcappaert OP t1_jbfdhts wrote
Reply to comment by myspicename in [OC] U.S. Laws that Changed the Name of a Post Office by gcappaert
These are post office renamings. The buildings already existed
gcappaert OP t1_jbd579i wrote
Tools: Pandas and matplotlib
Source: USPS list of dedicated post offices, https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/statistics
gcappaert OP t1_jaoin7z wrote
Reply to comment by Angrygiraffe1786 in [OC] Animal Welfare Inspections 2014-2022, interactive map by gcappaert
Also very possible
gcappaert OP t1_jaod87k wrote
Reply to comment by jxj24 in [OC] Animal Welfare Inspections 2014-2022, interactive map by gcappaert
85,700. I was trying to highlight the tiny minority that seem to be really messing up
gcappaert OP t1_jao6h1t wrote
See the interactive map here: https://gcappaert.github.io/datavis/inspections.html
You can click on a point to view or download the PDF report.
Mapping tools: Plotly + Pandas
Data source: USDA APHIS inspections by way of Data is Plural
gcappaert OP t1_jbfmm63 wrote
Reply to comment by DodgerWalker in [OC] U.S. Laws that Changed the Name of a Post Office by gcappaert
Line graph is the percentage. You're right! I should have used a legend or different color. Thank you!