geeky_username
geeky_username t1_j9hhkqz wrote
Very cool
Bookmarked and subscribed
geeky_username t1_j7jcy6k wrote
Reply to comment by mskogly in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Pichai has crippled Google
geeky_username t1_j7jcp21 wrote
Reply to comment by VelveteenAmbush in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Maybe Cortana won't be braindead
geeky_username t1_j7jcl06 wrote
Reply to comment by CrypticSplicer in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
Meta is fairly open with what it's doing. But it seems like their teams are disconnected so there's no coordination.
Google seems to only announce when it's approved or sufficiently polished. Or just never showing to the public.
Apple only releases as part of a product or feature.
geeky_username t1_j7jc9iq wrote
Reply to comment by bortlip in [N] Google: An Important Next Step On Our AI Journey by EducationalCicada
"can we see it?"
"... No"
geeky_username t1_j7chxwk wrote
Reply to comment by Freed4ever in [N] "I got access to Google LaMDA, the Chatbot that was so realistic that one Google engineer thought it was conscious. First impressions" by That_Violinist_18
>the fact that they invented it, but didn't release it, it means that they thought the technology would be a threat to them
I slightly disagree with this.
Imo, from what I know of Google from people that do or used to work there - they likely didn't care or didn't think of it.
Inside Google is a researcher's playground and there's little to no pressure to ever go to market. I've seen things that are extremely impressive that's never been published or put into a product. Asking why - they just don't care to do so.
The higher-ups lack imagination now, and unless something can directly obviously improve ads, they don't care.
So for years you've had engineers not caring to make something marketable, and leadership not caring but still throwing money at it. My impression is that leadership was looking for something that was so obviously a home run they didn't want to bother with releasing and iterating.
geeky_username t1_j7cgu86 wrote
Reply to comment by 7366241494 in [N] "I got access to Google LaMDA, the Chatbot that was so realistic that one Google engineer thought it was conscious. First impressions" by That_Violinist_18
>and it’s naïve for people to think ChatGPT is so special that it’s a threat to Google.
Google does a ton of R&D but really sucks(or doesn't care) about productizing.
That's where the real "threat" to them lies.
geeky_username t1_j358k76 wrote
Reply to comment by zeyus in [News] AMD Instinct MI300 APU for AI and HPC announced by samobon
>Is there something I've missed about AMD and software?
They have this https://gpuopen.com/
Which seems great in theory, but some of that hasn't been touched in a long time.
Radeon Rays: May 2021
They'll release something, do a bunch of initial work on it, and then it fades
geeky_username t1_j33cic6 wrote
Reply to comment by zeyus in [News] AMD Instinct MI300 APU for AI and HPC announced by samobon
Software.
Having AI compute hardware is rather pointless without the supporting software.
Nvidia has an entire CUDA ecosystem for developers to use
geeky_username t1_j331xz0 wrote
Reply to comment by ZaZaMood in [News] AMD Instinct MI300 APU for AI and HPC announced by samobon
"Those that fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it."
Especially on the software side, AMD has a habit of releasing something and then not doing much for continued support, expecting the community to foot the labor
geeky_username t1_j32l1cl wrote
Reply to comment by AlmightySnoo in [News] AMD Instinct MI300 APU for AI and HPC announced by samobon
>AMD needs to invest some resources to help there.
That's where it will fail
geeky_username t1_ivm89ch wrote
Reply to comment by runawayasfastasucan in [D] Academia: The highest funded plagiarist is also an AI ethicist by [deleted]
They also link to a blog which links to another blog which links to a blog with the accusations.
Just link the stuff directly
geeky_username t1_ivm2d71 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in [D] Academia: The highest funded plagiarist is also an AI ethicist by [deleted]
If only there were some way for you to link them on Reddit
I wonder if they'll ever have the technology
geeky_username t1_jcbh0mf wrote
Reply to comment by EnjoyableGamer in [D] What do people think about OpenAI not releasing its research but benefiting from others’ research? Should google meta enforce its patents against them? by [deleted]
OpenAI still has custom training methods, and whatever other tweaks they've made to the model