I read an article that it’s so good because they hired “almost slaves” at lowest possible price.. $2 was the rate.. don’t know if that’s per day or hour.. from some downtrodden country.

And hundreds to thousands of these serfs spent their days testing and manually training it. So they apparently got hundreds of thousands of hours of human manual training, at a price that many Americans could afford by taking a mortgage against their house- and apparently they are still there manually watching and reacting to queries in real time to verify answers are decent.. while the rest of the world gives them more data for free.

So when it says the servers are busy, to wait? That could mean the humans are busy ;p

I wouldn’t think so. The code for the video is digital, and patterns can be detected from the rendered frames, while a monitor displays converted data to analog light patterns. The only reason for a monitor is if the detector is a camera in front of the monitor sensing light patterns, then it would convert to digital patterns similar to the orginal code. That may be useful for interacting in the analog world and accounting for the way light reflects in an analog space, but I think that’s future tech, or maybe automated cars. You’d hope they’ve done some control/experiment to account for lighting changes like this