Do you like that, eh?

ad hominem: you're wrong because you're a dick.

Insult: you're a dick.

I was doing the second of those because of your extremely condescending tone.

It's not an ad hominem, it's an insult, dummy. Check what ad hominem means.

Take the top of my skull off and hook me up.

It's a pity schools can't teach people not to be bellends. You'd have benefited.

We're talking about pre-university level education, talking about quoting sources is rather grandiose. Most kids just look at the textbook and wikipedia. ChatGPT is not even lowering the level. Hopefully the context wasn't lost on you.

Because it often provides a well-written and clear summary of topics that are widely discussed on the internet, which would include most school level topics. So ultimately the student is more likely to understand and retain the knowledge if they read it and think about it.

It's the kids who are wrong.

Are they going to get to the moon by flapping their arms?

We can't be that far away from AIs where you can feed them maths textbooks and then papers just as you would a human.

So is molten steel.