jadams2345
jadams2345 t1_jdvo1qh wrote
Reply to comment by Wassux in How will you spend your time if/when AGI means you no longer have to work for a living (but you still have your basic needs met such as housing, food etc..)? by DreaminDemon177
You can't really reason in the place of AI. What seems logical to you might not seem "logical" to "it". What if AI ends up behaving like in the movie The Matrix? Because as long as humans are alive and well, they represent a threat. Humans will want to control AI to do their bidding. AI will want to do its own. For humans, it's either AI under control or no AI at all.
jadams2345 t1_jdfyto5 wrote
Reply to comment by bodden3113 in How will you spend your time if/when AGI means you no longer have to work for a living (but you still have your basic needs met such as housing, food etc..)? by DreaminDemon177
Of course it’s better, but it doesn’t make it more plausible 😅
jadams2345 t1_jdfxa46 wrote
Reply to How will you spend your time if/when AGI means you no longer have to work for a living (but you still have your basic needs met such as housing, food etc..)? by DreaminDemon177
Yeah, like someone is going to pay you and have your needs met without any effort from you! That’s not going to happen, AGI or no AGI 🤭
Have you learned nothing, my good sir/madam?
jadams2345 t1_ja37hiq wrote
Seems like the perks of being a Googler are taking a turn for the worst
jadams2345 t1_j9d00g9 wrote
Reply to Meta announces paid blue verification tick on Facebook and Instagram: Details by northmania
Anyone who's short on cash makes them blue verification ticks LOL I gotta start charging people for this too :)
jadams2345 t1_j8dm4q3 wrote
LOL! If this is legit, OP broke it :D
jadams2345 t1_j1s4qy7 wrote
Reply to comment by numba1mrdata in What do you see happening over the next 300 years to a millennia? In what way will it be different to how it is today? by Serious_Final_989
How can the trend be clear when WW2 has the highest toll in human history?
jadams2345 t1_j1s0886 wrote
Reply to comment by numba1mrdata in What do you see happening over the next 300 years to a millennia? In what way will it be different to how it is today? by Serious_Final_989
Really? Doesn't WW2 have like 50+ million casualties? 🤔
jadams2345 t1_j1q5k3v wrote
Reply to comment by static_void_function in What do you see happening over the next 300 years to a millennia? In what way will it be different to how it is today? by Serious_Final_989
I hope you're right 🙏
jadams2345 t1_j1q4tzy wrote
Reply to comment by static_void_function in What do you see happening over the next 300 years to a millennia? In what way will it be different to how it is today? by Serious_Final_989
Sure, but you omitted others: weapons buildup, tendency to kill eachother with weapons that are more and more powerful...
jadams2345 t1_j1q4eda wrote
Reply to comment by static_void_function in What do you see happening over the next 300 years to a millennia? In what way will it be different to how it is today? by Serious_Final_989
Optimistic and highly improbable
jadams2345 t1_j0tcxys wrote
AI + Capitalism = Catastrophe. Capitalists love reducing costs, and since they elect politicians to serve their agendas, it would mean that many people will find themselves out of jobs. I assume a tax on using AI will be imposed on companies to improve social welfare, but only for bare minimum. The whole political/economic system would have to be rebuilt.
jadams2345 t1_itpe7l2 wrote
No wonder people kill themselves a lot in South Korea
jadams2345 t1_jdx5jvf wrote
Reply to comment by Wassux in How will you spend your time if/when AGI means you no longer have to work for a living (but you still have your basic needs met such as housing, food etc..)? by DreaminDemon177
>Ofcourse I can because it is purely logical. We made it, so we can predict how it thinks. Especially me as a AI engineer. I know which function it optimizes for.
The AI we have now only minimizes the cost function we specify, yes.
>AI doesn't even consider threats. It doesn't want to live like us. I think you confuse general AI with conscious AI. Conscious AI is a terrible idea other than experimentation.
Yes. I might have confused the two.
>And AI doing our bidding is just as fine for AI as not doing our bidding. It has no emotions, no fear, no anger, no point. It just exists and does what it is told to do. General AI just means that it can make use of tools so it can do anything that it is told to do.
Yes.
>Again even if it is consious and not under our control but without emotions. Why would it fight us? It could just move over to mars and not risk it's existence. Not to mention it can outperform us any day, so we aren't a threat.
Here I don’t agree. When it’s possible to take control, people do take control. Why would a conscious AI go to Mars??? It takes control here and makes sure humans can’t shut it down.
>There is no reason to think it would hurt us other than irrational fear. And there is no chance that AI will have irrational fear.
AI won’t hurt us because it fears us, no. Rather, because it wants to eliminate all its weaknesses, which is a very logical thing to do.