katinla
katinla t1_j1e4luz wrote
Scientists have discussed this and agreed that we'd better not contaminate Mars with Earth life, at least not util we have confirmed if there is or isn't any indigenous life. This was formalized in article IX the Outer Space Treaty. Based on this agreement COSPAR was founded, and they defined the 5 categories of planetary protection.
Therefore, all vehicles going to Mars are thoroughly decontaminated before launch.
This requirement is a bit less strict for vehicles that are not intended to land, or going to other celestial bodies that are not deemed of any interest for the origins of life, or where Earth microbes are not expected to survive.
katinla t1_je6jpna wrote
Reply to comment by IamtheBoomstick in Ask Anything Wednesday - Physics, Astronomy, Earth and Planetary Science by AutoModerator
Considering the extreme temperatures, I'm having a hard time trying to conceive any way of getting even close to the Sun.
If the idea is mining helium from extraterrestrial sources, I'd rather point at the gas giants. You get manageable temperatures and much lower delta-vs (which translates directly into fuel requirements).
But still, this would be an extremely expensive (i.e. unrealistic) mission, not only in terms of money, but also in terms of resources such as materials and fuel. Consider that a round trip to an outer planet does not cost twice as much as sending a probe to stay there, it costs a lot more because fuel requirements grow exponentially with delta-v. This is in addition to the fuel required to lift off from a giant planet.