kerfitten1234

kerfitten1234 t1_j9vhtv4 wrote

Disclaimer: I am too lazy to read the article. This is all just prior knowledge.

The only assumption SETI makes is that aliens wouldn't disguise their radio emissions as natural sources. You don't need to understand the signal to realize that it wasn't produced by any known natural phenomenon, and wasn't random.

An ai could quickly filter through the signals, eliminating any that have an obvious natural cause, passing the potentially interesting ones on to people.

5

kerfitten1234 t1_j9fwspn wrote

Particles are constantly appearing and annihilating, even in front of your face right now. It's called vacuum energy.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy

>Vacuum energy can also be thought of in terms of virtual particles (also known as vacuum fluctuations) which are created and destroyed out of the vacuum. These particles are always created out of the vacuum in particle–antiparticle pairs, which in most cases shortly annihilate each other and disappear. However, these particles and antiparticles may interact with others before disappearing, a process which can be mapped using Feynman diagrams.

The process involving black holes is called hawking radiation.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawking_radiation

1

kerfitten1234 t1_j970pm4 wrote

Lol, your source is an opinion piece meant for kids.

https://www.britannica.com/science/meteorite-crater/The-impact-cratering-process

>Earth’s atmosphere certainly slows and prevents typical asteroidal fragments up to a few tens of metres across from reaching the surface and forming a true hypervelocity impact crater, but kilometre-scale objects of the kind that created the smallest telescopically visible craters on the Moon are not significantly slowed by Earth’s atmosphere...

The atmosphere shielding the surface is not the reason for that lack of craters on earth.

2

kerfitten1234 t1_j96w8e9 wrote

Mars is a cold desert, like Antarctica. Also mars' atmosphere is too thin to allow water to exist in liquid form on the surface, except in special circumstances.

8

kerfitten1234 t1_j96viy6 wrote

No, it's because of erosion and the fact that earth is tectonically active. Any meteor large enough to leave a decent crater isn't going to be stopped by an atmosphere.

3

kerfitten1234 t1_j96t87r wrote

IIRC(applies to entire comment) mars rovers haven't actually been 'driven' since before MER. The rovers have rudimentary AI that takes instructions like "do science on that rock from this picture" and figures out how to do it, only needing humans for complex precise movements or troubleshooting.

51

kerfitten1234 t1_j8twy5e wrote

Kamaʻehuakanaloa is far to close to the big island to be the next island in the chain, it will join with the island soon after breaching the surface, if Kilauea doesn't fill in the gap before then. In fact, if the increased magma output doesn't slow down, I would expect individual islands to stop being a thing except at the tail end of the landmass, roughly where Kauai currently is.

5

kerfitten1234 t1_j6v2m7y wrote

Did you even read the paper? What the paper authors did was take a real heatwave (August '15 I think), model what the cities temps would have been with 30% more trees(something that requires a decent understanding of the effect you claim is just being 'discovered' here), calculate new death tolls from that, then compare the new death tolls with the real death tolls.

Your annoyance is misplaced, scientists know that trees make cities better in many ways, which is why they are performing studies like this one, to convince policymakers and developers to consider the benefits.

18