likethatwhenigothere
likethatwhenigothere t1_j74qmyo wrote
Reply to comment by I_ONLY_PLAY_4C_LOAM in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
I asked it something today and it came back with an answer that seemed correct. I then asked for it to give me examples. It gave two examples and the way it was written seemed absolutely plausible. However I knew the examples and knew that they were wrong. It gave other examples that I couldn't verify anywhere, yet as I asked more questions it kept doubling down on the previous examples.
I won't go into detail about what I was asking, but it basically said the Nintendo logo was made up of three rings to represent three core values of the business. I went through Nintendo's logo history to see if it ever had three rings and as far I can tell it didn't. So fuck knows where it got the info from.
likethatwhenigothere t1_j76c7nb wrote
Reply to comment by I_ONLY_PLAY_4C_LOAM in ChatGPT: Use of AI chatbot in Congress and court rooms raises ethical questions by mossadnik
But aren't people using it as factual tool and not just getting it to write content that could be 'plausible'? There's been talk about this changing the world, how it passed medical and law exams - which obviously needs to be factual. Surely if theres a lack of trust in the information its providing, people are going to be uncertain about using it. If you have to fact check everything its providing, you might as well just to do the research/work yourself because you're effectively doubling up the work. You're checking all the work chatgpt does and then having to fix any errors its made.
Here's what I actually asked chatgtp in regard to my previous comment.
I asked if the borrowmean symbol (three interlinked rings) was popular in Japanese history. It stated it was, and give me a little bit of history about how it became popular. I asked it to provide examples of where it can be seen. It came back saying temple gates, family crests etc. But it also said it was still widely used today and could be seen in Japanese advertising, branding and product packaging. I asked for an example of branding where its used. It responded...
"One example of modern usage of the Borromean rings is in the logo of the Japanese video game company, Nintendo. The three interlocking rings symbolize the company's commitment to producing quality video games that bring people together".
Now that is something that can be easily checked or confirmed or refuted. But what if its providing a response that can't be?