lunex
lunex t1_j52h96u wrote
Reply to comment by RodgerRodgy in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
It just makes too much sense, right?
lunex t1_j529fom wrote
Reply to comment by pmMeAllofIt in Ancient humans and their early depictions of the universe: “It is no exaggeration to say that astronomy has existed as an exact science for more than five millennia,” writes the late science historian John North. by clayt6
Have you heard the theory going around that Graham Hancock is actually much much older than he claims to be? Some are saying he’s maybe as much as 13,000 years old and an immortal descendent of the same pre-Ice Age civilization he talks about on his show. Ever since this theory surfaced Hancock has been running scared, and has refused to take a simple blood test which would prove his DNA is ancient. And yet he won’t. You have to wonder, why is that? Do your own research and connect the dots. Could Graham Hancock really be suppressing his own lost pre-historic origins? Ancient Hancock Theorists say: yes!
lunex t1_j23lgxx wrote
Reply to Lunar Gateway for Dummies? by Significant_Youth_73
The dummies included on Artemis-1 (Moonikin Campos, Helga, and Zohar) won’t be going to Gsteway. As far as I know Lunar Gateway will be for humans only.
lunex t1_j14ypel wrote
We don’t know, but I think we need to consider the possibility. We have a “scale chauvinism” that makes us think in terms of human, animal, microbe, and surely the universe has more creativity in store than even the huge biodiversity we see on Earth.
lunex t1_ixr3s00 wrote
Reply to comment by roundearthervaxxer in NASA’s Orion capsule captures gorgeous close-up pictures of the moon by Miguenzo
It’s coming on the inbound leg
lunex t1_ix6h6c2 wrote
Reply to An archaeologist's rebuttal against Graham Hancock and Netflix's Ancient Apocalypse by MeatballDom
How can we be sure Graham Hancock isn’t 12,000 years old and an immortal descendant of this ice age civilization? Why won’t he submit to DNA testing to verify his real age? Many are saying it’s because he is much, much older than he claims to be! Ancient Hancock theory is quickly gaining steam and calls for him to verify his blood contains ancient DNA will only grow louder.
lunex t1_j6bd80m wrote
Reply to Can you kindly suggest me decent science fiction books regarding space? (More details below) by This_Foundation_7970
Red Mars, Blue Mars, Green Mars; the trilogy by KSR