mattmentecky
mattmentecky t1_j61j7zx wrote
mattmentecky t1_j60ob2p wrote
Reply to Sheetz reviewing ‘smile policy’ that says employees can’t have visible dental issues by clydesawhill
The place whose business model is selling chewing tobacco, cigarettes, coffee and sugary drinks is against employees with bad teeth.
mattmentecky t1_j5ynkmn wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in Uber Eats guy walks onto the court in the middle of the Loyola Chicago - Duquesne game by rehtulx
Fans that go onto fields or courts can catch trespassing charges pretty easily, it would be surprising if a big company like Uber came up with an idea that involved a potential charge, but who knows stranger things have happened.
mattmentecky t1_j2pqdkp wrote
Reply to comment by BitterFuture in Sources: Brackenridge Police Chief Justin McIntire killed, another officer injured in shootout with suspect by swizzcheez
You obviously are correct. But just to add, I am from the area, Brackenridge isn’t rural, about 25 minutes from Pittsburgh. It’s just an incredibly small town, it’s gotta be the smallest community nearby and there really isn’t any justification to have its own police force (my opinion). Local communities nearby have consolidated police departments recently. Maybe in the past when the local steel mill was running and in its heyday but not now.
mattmentecky t1_iw0x81t wrote
Reply to comment by Showerbeerz413 in Analysts entirely misread the Fetterman-Oz debate. These graphs show how wrong they were by immigrantpatriot
That’s unfair to Bond villains.
mattmentecky t1_is52k4z wrote
Reply to Pittsburgh Conspiracy Theories by punkie23
More of a Pittsburgh-suburbs conspiracy theory but the Apollo Affair:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Apollo_Affair
The conspiracy theory that missing enriched uranium from an Apollo nuclear company in 1965 went to Israel as part of their nuclear weapons program. I can’t tell if it’s potentially true or not at all, depending on what you read it goes either way.
mattmentecky t1_j6b3n38 wrote
Reply to comment by AirtimeAficionado in Anyone know about the demonstration at City Hall? "This rats not for you" is on the inflatable rat's shirt. I can't read the flags. by CasualFriday11
I take it to mean “a scab worker is not on your side”. They planned to take the rat to John Block’s wedding which would be a weird place to say the rat isn’t striking against them. Plus an exclamation mark makes more sense staking a position rather than notifying people that a message isn’t directed at them.