Sarah Palin lost and she blamed RCV and why a Democrat won the seat. "Conservatives" will hate on this so fast. Never going to happen to the party of Scott Perry.

Wawa worshiping customer. Sheetz has the Big Mos is a fried chicken sandwich with three fried mozzarella sticks with Marana sauce. Best fat food heart attack out there.

I think you fail to understand that the chair of any political party is in charge of anything passed in legislation. At most they set up party's platform.

Bill Clinton was super proud of this legislation. He claimed victory.

Well it was Bill Clinton as the leader of the DNC and also signed the law into effect. He still claims it was a good bill and blames local and state governments.

https://www.factcheck.org/2016/04/bill-clinton-and-the-1994-crime-bill/

It's not that much money it is political suicide to be seen as weak on crime. So we end up with crazy three strikes your out laws via Bill Clinton.

I seriously would love to know what your saying is conected to what I said. There is so misunderstanding on both of our sides.

Religion is certainly not the worst. It was out of religion that so many worthy causes were taken up. US Absolutionist were religious. Ghandi was religious and so many that fight against poverty.

The issue is where the religious get their beliefs and based on what. Most of today's Christian Nationalist is based on people wanting power. It's not based on the Bible they claim to uphold. Bible preaches against fear but they listen to fear mongers. They us religion for selfish motives and sake. There are amazing religious people through history and in the world today..

Just like there are horrible none religious people. Stalin, Po Pot and so many more.

So much hate and has been done through the excuse of God or beliefs. Doesn't mean it's right nor religious.

Case in point, The Crussades and how deeply people believed in the hate, The Children's Crussade.

It is HATE there is no place in the Bible where it says to refuse service to people that disbelieve in you and Jesus forgave the sinners and rebuked the "Religious." "Christian" people don't know their Bible they just know what other people say the Bible says.

​

I have a Theology Degree and several years of Hebrew and Greek each. Love Jesus and shake my head at ignorant people who claim beliefs when they are based on hate and not scripture.

As a Christian and former Pastor, JUST CALL WHOM EVER WHATEVER THEY WANT. Iy's not your name so whocares? The ones who care about other names usually have a "Don't Tread on Me" flag on their house, Car License Plate and Coffee Mug.

Really? If there is no salary only people who are independently wealthy can take those positions. That therefore is not a representation of our country.

That was way up there and you got caught up on only dealing with salary and $100 was the same thing and said I was wrong with history and I said what about history and you then tried to tell me my math skill was stupid because $100 and salary are the same and I stated you suck at debate.

Logic and debate is hard. Salary as in can you live making $100 a year. Your really bad at this sorry.

Salary for a year is not $100 so your point is about how non rich people can take these positions is mute.

SALARY is what you are paid for work. $100 is a stipen you are just hard headed. I said only rich could represent us if they were not paid a salary. If your paid $100for a year's work your missing the meaning of the word salary and your making any payment to mean salary. Your argument skills are frustrating and not productive to communicate your opinion. The thing your arguing is that it's not a big deal if only rich can afford to be full time representative. Your arguing me about salary a totally side subject and even being foolish with your hammering on about the payment of $100 and salary has anything to do with the central argument that a salary or payment that is equal to a full time job is needed so that ecconomically self-sufficient people aka rich would be the sole people who can govern.

Okay $100 is a salary? At minumum wages this is not even a weeks pay.

Your making so many logical falacies and this argument is dead due to you trying to do symantic gymnastics with the legal term salary. You live your life and support your family on $100 a year. $100 is a stipen.

/Who said anything about no salary?

You DID! to quote you exactly.
"They get, what, a hundred bucks a year for their service...' That is not a salary. Representation of the people means there should be a diversity of voices.

What history? I am dying to know how history shows that non rich people can be legislators with no salary.

So only the rich may take political seats? Getting rid of salaries makes it so only people well enough off to take these positions. Seems stupid to me.