needlzor
needlzor t1_iyy4ujr wrote
Reply to comment by deepbootygame in [D] NeurIPS 2022 Outstanding Paper modified results significantly in the camera ready by Even_Stay3387
Academia is fine. It's benchmark-driven science, which seems to be most of ML research, that is a problem.
needlzor t1_ivessgu wrote
Reply to comment by jfrankle in [D] Git Re-Basin Paper Accused of Misinformation by fryingnem0
Misinformation is not necessarily malevolent, it's just misleading or incorrect. Disinformation is deliberately spread false information.
needlzor t1_isd2xpx wrote
Reply to This Danish Political Party Is Led by an AI | The Synthetic Party in Denmark is dedicated to following a platform churned out by an AI, and its public face is a chatbot named Leader Lars. by mossadnik
This is dumb but I love it. I teach a postgraduate course of conversational AI and I was looking for ideas for the final exam.
needlzor t1_j9sspwd wrote
Reply to comment by adventurousprogram4 in [D] To the ML researchers and practitioners here, do you worry about AI safety/alignment of the type Eliezer Yudkowsky describes? by SchmidhuberDidIt
Surprised I had to scroll down this much to see this opinion, which I agree completely with. The danger I worry about most isn't superintelligent AI, it's people like Yudkowsky creating their little cults around the potential for superintelligent AI.